• Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.

Kill = Heal (A saving grace for people who solo)

fuzypoo

Survivor
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
96
Reaction score
97
I actually quite like this idea, if on a smaller scale. I feel a more balanced suggestion would be 3 hearts recovery for a kill.
This is a good idea. If not a full heart regeneration, a small heal (like from a Potion of Healing I) would be a small benefit that I would enjoy just as much. I think this would be more accepted by the majority of players since it is a somewhat insignificant benefit for people who solo, but it gives the people who solo a slightly better chance to take out a team. Thank you for the suggestion!
 

Zaex

Diamond
Joined
Mar 30, 2013
Messages
2,441
Reaction score
2,765
If it was like 1-1.5 hearts, then I guess it could be understandable. It doesn't give the user a huge buff (Unlike 3 hearts) and it can be a quick thing. I like the idea of a regen, so the user COULD still be killed while regening the 1-1.5 hearts. The idea of instantly heal, to me, is a no-no.
 

fuzypoo

Survivor
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
96
Reaction score
97
Well, that's stupid.
Would you mind reading the original post, please? This post is unnecessary, and it provides no contributions to the advancement of this idea. If you do not like the idea, that's fine. However, there is no need to call one's idea stupid when it may turn out to be a good idea. Thank you.

No, too op.
Full heart regeneration may be too OP, but have you taken a look at the suggestions that are listed right next to full regeneration? How about a 3 heart regeneration? I do not consider that OP. A golden apple restores 2 hearts and provides the user with a two heart defence. The 3 heart regeneration is not OP if golden apples are allowed. If you still think this is "too OP" please provide some insight on the matter as that would help me understand why you think this is. Thank you!
 

BaronHarry

Survivor
Joined
Aug 27, 2013
Messages
123
Reaction score
36
Would you mind reading the original post, please? This post is unnecessary, and it provides no contributions to the advancement of this idea. If you do not like the idea, that's fine. However, there is no need to call one's idea stupid when it may turn out to be a good idea. Thank you.



Full heart regeneration may be too OP, but have you taken a look at the suggestions that are listed right next to full regeneration? How about a 3 heart regeneration? I do not consider that OP. A golden apple restores 2 hearts and provides the user with a two heart defence. The 3 heart regeneration is not OP if golden apples are allowed. If you still think this is "too OP" please provide some insight on the matter as that would help me understand why you think this is. Thank you!
if you're you're playing a clanwar and your teammate and you are low on hp and their enemies are too. And one of them die, the one who killes him now has 3 hearts + and they win just because of this.
 

_Reevesdrums_

Platinum
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
188
Reaction score
171
So many dumb people saying "thats stupid it will make me feel bad"
even when you said constructive arguments only.

Well I like the idea personally, of course full health would be too much, but 3 hearts seems like a fair trade off to me.
Otherwise I would at least like to see XP for killing to help prevent campers, but thats different all together...
 

Ordies

Experienced
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
493
Reaction score
401
Would you mind reading the original post, please? This post is unnecessary, and it provides no contributions to the advancement of this idea. If you do not like the idea, that's fine. However, there is no need to call one's idea stupid when it may turn out to be a good idea. Thank you.



Full heart regeneration may be too OP, but have you taken a look at the suggestions that are listed right next to full regeneration? How about a 3 heart regeneration? I do not consider that OP. A golden apple restores 2 hearts and provides the user with a two heart defence. The 3 heart regeneration is not OP if golden apples are allowed. If you still think this is "too OP" please provide some insight on the matter as that would help me understand why you think this is. Thank you!
I've read the OP, it's stupid, it gives a unrealistic aspect, and it's way too OP, there's no rengeration in Hunger games is there?
 

kstorm2

Experienced
Joined
May 16, 2013
Messages
297
Reaction score
142
I take pride in the skill it takes for me to 3 v 1 a team... This would make it less special.

Plus wouldn't teams heal when they kill people too?
 

fuzypoo

Survivor
Joined
Apr 19, 2013
Messages
96
Reaction score
97
I've read the OP, it's stupid, it gives a unrealistic aspect, and it's way too OP, there's no rengeration in Hunger games is there?
An unrealistic aspect? How about eating an apple that gives you brief regeneration and two extra hearts of defence? That seems unrealistic to me. Video games don't have to be realistic. Do you think a fishing pole would be used for real life combat? As for "too OP," a golden apple provides a more beneficial effect than this idea. If "too OP," is your argument, then we might as well take golden apples out of the game. Golden apples cause a brief regeneration effect.

So many dumb people saying "thats stupid it will make me feel bad"
even when you said constructive arguments only.

Well I like the idea personally, of course full health would be too much, but 3 hearts seems like a fair trade off to me.
Otherwise I would at least like to see XP for killing to help prevent campers, but thats different all together...
Thank you for suggestion that 3 hearts would be better than full heart regeneration. As for players dropping exp on death, I strongly agree with this because people who get more kills deserve a better chance at winning the game.

I take pride in the skill it takes for me to 3 v 1 a team... This would make it less special.

Plus wouldn't teams heal when they kill people too?
I do love it when I take a team of 3 out because it does require some skill, but I'll admit that I don't do it that often. This idea wasn't thought of just on my personal experience, but rather, I thought about the opinions of all people who solo. For many players, taking on a team is extremely difficult. I have been playing for a while now, and I do know strategies to take out teams. However, this idea is to benefit most people who solo and do not have the skill to take out people who team as of now.

Also, I can gaurantee that if you fight a team of 2 or more that are of a high caliber. There is an extremely slim chance you will be able to take them out. They know where the right chests are, they know winning strategies and techniques the prey might use to take them out, and it is two well-geared players versus one. This idea is to help out the majority of the people who solo while playing MCSG.

Players who team will, also, receive this benefit after a kill, but it is not of much use if they kill the target and no one else is around them, whereas if you were soloing and you take out a teamer, you will get a little regeneration to help you take out the other teamer.
 

EvermoreHD

Peacekeeper
Joined
Mar 3, 2013
Messages
1,760
Reaction score
1,095
3 hearts is still OP, considering Golden Apples take time to eat.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
242,193
Messages
2,449,610
Members
523,972
Latest member
Atasci