The point of reporting hackers is to help the community, not to get moderator.
Yeah, we've gone over that. But by helping the community, they show that they are trying to become deserving of another shot at Moderator. I think you're forgetting that there can be conditions such as how long since your last ban, activity, and they still have to go through an interviewing and applying process,
in addition to having their ban(s) overlooked, which could be easily as difficult as an age exception process.
If you hacked a year ago that means you must be at least 14 years old. I think a 14 year old knows right from wrong.
I've seen adults hack. I've been on TEAMSPEAK with adults who were hacking. Some people don't care about ethics and morals, and thus would be highly unlikely to apply for Mod.
Flase bans get pardoned. If a player gets pardoned than they should be allowed to apply for mod. But I think they are talking about players who did hack and were rightly banned.
I speak from personal experience when I say that not all false bans get pardoned. You're claiming that the unbanning system is virtually perfect, which is far from true. It may be decently effective, but it is still based on human efficiency and accuracy, which will never be ideal. There are always bans due to glitches, lag, and other unusual or unfair events and circumstances that the player is not responsible for, but still are banned for.
What? Me and
boboy1999 said the same thing. We both said to report hackers for the community, not for mod.
The post that he said that you liked was saying that people who do that DON'T care about the community.
How does it mean he must be 14 years old?
The age limit to apply for Mod is 15. One year before would be at least 14, which would not be entirely accurate because he never specified when exactly his ban was.