Theoretical
District 13
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2012
- Messages
- 1,359
- Reaction score
- 6,933
Bleh though. Why doesn't the community like having more power?I agree, and I like that. It's just that most of the community doesn't
Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
Bleh though. Why doesn't the community like having more power?I agree, and I like that. It's just that most of the community doesn't
If it actually happened only 5% of the time then yeah, but it seems to happen a lot more than that if you ask me personally and I've seen tonnes of people say the same thing. However, I still disagree with the system because if 1 person voted for one map, it shouldn't even be an option compared to 20 people.Okay, I'll pardon your rudeness.
Maybe I should've worded it better. Granted, it still makes sense the way I put it. Forumers have played this game a lot more then most of the in-game community. We have seen lots of changes before. And because we have so much more experience with change, we might understand what the people are looking for. We may have a better understanding of what we want.
Also, 1 vote winning against a map with (let's say) 20 votes has a 5% chance of winning. That will only happen 5% of the time. 19/20 out of 20 games. Is that really such an annoyance? It takes at most 5 minutes to find another server with maps you're happy with.
I feel like it is correct.If it actually happened only 5% of the time then yeah, but it seems to happen a lot more than that if you ask me personally and I've seen tonnes of people say the same thing. However, I still disagree with the system because if 1 person voted for one map, it shouldn't even be an option compared to 20 people.
I'm saying from personal experience it seems like the maps with 5% or less chance has actually won a lot more than it should. I haven't played much at all in the past week and have seen it happen a fair bit, that explains something.I feel like it is correct.
Think about it this way. Are you going to screenshot a map winning with a lot of votes? No, right? That's why we have been seeing those screenshots. Just, because it's 'rare'. If it was happening that much, we'd see a lot more of them/complaints.
But also, let's say you're a person who really likes a certain map that's never played. This way, your vote actually counts. You actually have a chance. Not a lot of chances, but a chance.
Yesterday, I talked about it with the admins. They liked it.I'm saying from personal experience it seems like the maps with 5% or less chance has actually won a lot more than it should. I haven't played much at all in the past week and have seen it happen a fair bit, that explains something.
I just hope they listen to the polls.
I was actually waiting for that comment hence why I included the fact that I've barely played lately and I've seen it a fair bit. Either way it doesn't change the fact that when the map with 5% wins a lot more people are getting disappointed and frustrated. Okay, that one person won their map of choice, awesome for them but why please one person when you can please 23 others. That's my overall point, it's a ridiculous way to look at things. Most people are just saying leave if you don't like it but the fact is, if you don't like playing the 'overplayed' maps then why don't you leave? Why should we leave? The map we wanted was majority voted for, how's it fair that we need to leave after waiting a full lobby time for a map we were certain was going to win? I honestly think it's very unfair.I've actually about it with the admins yesterday. They liked it.
Again though, do you realize when a map wins with a lot of votes? It's a psychological thing. Because it's rare, when it does happen it feels special. We think about special things more often, right? That's why it feels off.
But again, you're focusing on the 5%. What about the 95% of the time where mostly everyone gets what they want?I was actually waiting for that comment hence why I included the fact that I've barely played lately and I've seen it a fair bit. Either way it doesn't change the fact that when the map with 5% wins a lot more people are getting disappointed and frustrated. Okay, that one person won their map of choice, awesome for them but why please one person when you can please 23 others. That's my overall point, it's a ridiculous way to look at things. Most people are just saying leave if you don't like it but the fact is, if you don't like playing the 'overplayed' maps then why don't you leave? Why should we leave? The map we wanted was majority voted for, how's it fair that we need to leave after waiting a full lobby time for a map we were certain was going to win? I honestly think it's very unfair.
I seem to be apart of the lobbies that the 5% wins.But again, you're focusing on the 5%. What about the 95% of the time where mostly everyone gets what they want?
MCSG sure is a game of luck!I seem to be apart of the lobbies that the 5% wins.
okay?MCSG sure is a game of luck!