No and to be honest I've started to play a lot less than usual anyway, just figured I'd post my opinion. I'm not 'upset' that my diamond donor doesn't guarantee a game on a map that I like anymore.
and I don't want to play the maps. It's becoming more clear to me that the people who are here to PvP, including myself clearly like the maps with much more flat lands and these are usually the 'overplayed' maps. I know you guys say "PvP isn't that important we just wanna push someone off a cliff". Yes it's 'survival games' as I see a lot as an excuse, but you can't survive if you need to flee and there's no where to run because you have to keep jumping up some cliff where they can still hit you.
I still think this change was not needed because they're pleasing the minority rather than the majority. Sure it seems like you guys have the majority here but go and ask for opinions in-game. Not everyone posts on the forums, hell, I bet most don't even visit this side of the server.
I also see you guys saying if you don't like the map then leave - hell, you can do this too ya'know, so why complain about overplayed maps?
If you ask me the PvP element is the most important factor to MCSG, that's why people play, that's why people get addicted to it.
"If clearly no one wants to play a map then why did one person vote for it? Also, it's fair that this map has a chance of winning, because someone does want to play it. Sure, the map should lose most of the time. But it's unfair to throw out the opinion of one person on the map that should be played solely because they don't agree with everyone else."
I still completely disagree, why should 1 person out of 23 be satisfied, it's completely unfair to the majority. Now, if you say "If you don't like it, then leave" That'd leave one player remaining if all 23 disliked the map, in this case if that 1 person didn't want to play the 'overplayed' map then they have all the rights to leave, that was 23 people are satisfied.
