Ok, put us both in a deathmatch together, one with a bow and one with a sword - the sword would destroy the bow every time. and who am I? I'm a really good player that has more experience in studies and battles than you, sir.
It's funny you should mention that, especially when I have more games played and won than you do.
And it wouldn't "destroy the bow every time," it would "destroy the bow most of the time".
I never said that bows are superior to swords, I just said that it's possible to win with nothing but a bow if that's all you managed to get.
And now that I've said that, you're probably going to say "no good player would have just a bow by deathmatch"
Sorry, but although hitting 30 chests will USUALLY get you at least a stone sword, I have had one or two games where I've gotten nothing but food, leather, stone axe, and a ton of flint, sticks, and feathers. When you pit THAT against someone with gold/chain and iron/diamond it's kind of pointless to run in with your axe and hope that he has bad aim.
I'm bring it up because I HAVE done it before.
You on the other hand are just theorycrafting and making assumptions.
Why are you even being so negative about my "oh I've won a few games with a bow!" anyway?