Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
You are allowed to challenge down. This is to make sure you don't lose your spot.You can challenge outside the leader board system. Regardless it's Soul 's call.
You'll get an official ruling by tomorrow morning.Now that the evidence was uploaded, can we get an official ruling
oh shtFor the final decision on the Insidious vs Trivium battle:
After reviewing all the evidence and consulting with the staff watching the battle, while taking every factor into consideration, we have decided that there will be no redo on the round and Insidious will be taking the win as 3-2.
Reason:
- The video evidence presented did not show that the indicated player was a hacker. However, it did show him PvPing normally, which may lead to the suspicion that he could be toggling, but no further evidence shows otherwise.
- The screenshot shows that a staff member did tell cscoop to leave, but this was before he had pointed out that he was killed by a hacker. Unfortunately, it was his fault for not enforcing his right to spectate and record, therefore this cannot be accounted for.
Branbob83 SertifiedBlocks
Did Insidious not rank up from this?For the final decision on the Insidious vs Trivium battle:
After reviewing all the evidence and consulting with the staff watching the battle, while taking every factor into consideration, we have decided that there will be no redo on the round and Insidious will be taking the win as 3-2.
Reason:
- The video evidence presented did not show that the indicated player was a hacker. However, it did show him PvPing normally, which may lead to the suspicion that he could be toggling, but no further evidence shows otherwise.
- The screenshot shows that a staff member did tell cscoop to leave, but this was before he had pointed out that he was killed by a hacker. Unfortunately, it was his fault for not enforcing his right to spectate and record, therefore this cannot be accounted for.
Branbob83 SertifiedBlocks
Oh shat insidious smaking kidzFor the final decision on the Insidious vs Trivium battle:
After reviewing all the evidence and consulting with the staff watching the battle, while taking every factor into consideration, we have decided that there will be no redo on the round and Insidious will be taking the win as 3-2.
Reason:
- The video evidence presented did not show that the indicated player was a hacker. However, it did show him PvPing normally, which may lead to the suspicion that he could be toggling, but no further evidence shows otherwise.
- The screenshot shows that a staff member did tell cscoop to leave, but this was before he had pointed out that he was killed by a hacker. Unfortunately, it was his fault for not enforcing his right to spectate and record, therefore this cannot be accounted for.
Branbob83 SertifiedBlocks
Keep those kinds of comments do yourself please.Oh shat insidious smaking kidz
SowwwyKeep those kinds of comments do yourself please.