US Clan Leaderboards

[Tironas11]

You can challenge outside the leader board system. Regardless it's Soul 's call.

trust me i know a lot about this system, soul gave us permission and actually told us to challenge rebels last night lol

 

[NativeTalent]

You can challenge outside the leader board system. Regardless it's Soul 's call.

You are allowed to challenge down. This is to make sure you don't lose your spot.

 

[Soul]

Alright, let me clear some things up.

Any clan is now allowed to challenge any clan below them, but if they lose, they will lose their spot and be placed below them. If they win, there will be no spot change, but bragging rights and a nice win will be given to them.

An example:
1. Forgotten
2. Rebels
3. Trivium
4. Insidious
Forgotten challenges Insidious and loses:
1. Rebels
2. Trivium
3. Insidious
4. Forgotten

Any clan will be able to do this now.

Implemented Today:
- Clans can challenge clans below them, but will lose their spot and move below the challenged clan if they lose.
- Rules are being changed today.

 

[SertifiedBlocks]

Now that the evidence was uploaded, can we get an official ruling

 

[Soul]

Now that the evidence was uploaded, can we get an official ruling

You'll get an official ruling by tomorrow morning.

Further News:
- IPureGold has been promoted to Head Referee.

 

[IPureGold]

For the final decision on the Insidious vs Trivium battle:
After reviewing all the evidence and consulting with the staff watching the battle, while taking every factor into consideration, we have decided that there will be no redo on the round and Insidious will be taking the win as 3-2.

Reason:
- The video evidence presented did not show that the indicated player was a hacker. However, it did show him PvPing normally, which may lead to the suspicion that he could be toggling, but no further evidence shows otherwise.
- The screenshot shows that a staff member did tell cscoop to leave, but this was before he had pointed out that he was killed by a hacker. Unfortunately, it was his fault for not enforcing his right to spectate and record, therefore this cannot be accounted for.

Branbob83 SertifiedBlocks

 

[NativeTalent]

For the final decision on the Insidious vs Trivium battle:
After reviewing all the evidence and consulting with the staff watching the battle, while taking every factor into consideration, we have decided that there will be no redo on the round and Insidious will be taking the win as 3-2.

Reason:
- The video evidence presented did not show that the indicated player was a hacker. However, it did show him PvPing normally, which may lead to the suspicion that he could be toggling, but no further evidence shows otherwise.
- The screenshot shows that a staff member did tell cscoop to leave, but this was before he had pointed out that he was killed by a hacker. Unfortunately, it was his fault for not enforcing his right to spectate and record, therefore this cannot be accounted for.

Branbob83 SertifiedBlocks

oh sht

 

[EyeHasNoIdea]

For the final decision on the Insidious vs Trivium battle:
After reviewing all the evidence and consulting with the staff watching the battle, while taking every factor into consideration, we have decided that there will be no redo on the round and Insidious will be taking the win as 3-2.

Reason:
- The video evidence presented did not show that the indicated player was a hacker. However, it did show him PvPing normally, which may lead to the suspicion that he could be toggling, but no further evidence shows otherwise.
- The screenshot shows that a staff member did tell cscoop to leave, but this was before he had pointed out that he was killed by a hacker. Unfortunately, it was his fault for not enforcing his right to spectate and record, therefore this cannot be accounted for.

Branbob83 SertifiedBlocks

Did Insidious not rank up from this?

 

[HarborSeal]

Soul on behalf of The Beginning we challenge Tigers to an 8v8 clan battle Zarmax5

 

[theamazinggeek]

For the final decision on the Insidious vs Trivium battle:
After reviewing all the evidence and consulting with the staff watching the battle, while taking every factor into consideration, we have decided that there will be no redo on the round and Insidious will be taking the win as 3-2.

Reason:
- The video evidence presented did not show that the indicated player was a hacker. However, it did show him PvPing normally, which may lead to the suspicion that he could be toggling, but no further evidence shows otherwise.
- The screenshot shows that a staff member did tell cscoop to leave, but this was before he had pointed out that he was killed by a hacker. Unfortunately, it was his fault for not enforcing his right to spectate and record, therefore this cannot be accounted for.

Branbob83 SertifiedBlocks

Oh shat insidious smaking kidz

 

[HarborSeal]

Oh shat insidious smaking kidz

Keep those kinds of comments do yourself please.

 

[theamazinggeek]

Keep those kinds of comments do yourself please.

Sowwwy