Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
Well yeah. Croe's lost his spot anyway. MCPharoh is gonna sweat the number one position from now on.All in all, I cease to understand why people care so much about this.
just a heads up i have picture proof of this but ill poke it to you when u get on ts later lmao(I will provide headings for the sections if some decide that they only want to read parts of it.)
- HOWEVER, if Croe decides to manually start these games, then it is using a method that closely relates to boosting. This allows Croe to ALWAYS or at least OCCASIONALLY play in low person servers, providing an unfair advantage considering that he will always or occasionally get fast wins. However, getting evidence of this is still relatively hard as one will have to be able to record it happening in-game, from lobby to force-start.
sir, most of the time gravey maintained #1 was the time that 12 players where needed to start games. everyone knew he played really late at night. no1 cares. who cares its legos. its glorfied legos. who cares. please stop caring everyone please.Actually Gravey4rd did.
Back on the old leaderboards there was the same thing as now, where you could see how many players there were in a game and when someone died and to who. Most people did not know about it. I wanted to make a thread back then about the 5-6 player games Gravey4rd played, but I didn't want to cause hate and flame, so I didn't make the thread.
Gravey4rd only played late at night, when no one was on on EU. All his games were 6 player games.
Yeah, we all know the legacy players are the best anyways cxThis is the thing that I see so many people having misunderstandings of. In cases like croe, people will go around saying he boosts because they beat him in a 1v1, therefore they're better and he's a no-good booster. These people not only anger me in the sense that they obviously don't know how to control themselves, but they do not know either how the leaderboards work. Never has it been that the top ranking players on the leaderboards were the best PvP'ers or players, with the exception of MAYBE the first few months of MCSG's existence.
All in all, I cease to understand why people care so much about this.
Exactly I don't get why people have to hate on croe. And since MCGamer V2 (November 2014) You only needed 6 players to start.]
sir, most of the time gravey maintained #1 was the time that 12 players where needed to start games. everyone knew he played really late at night. no1 cares. who cares its legos. its glorfied legos. who cares. please top caring everyone please.
Actually that rule was put in place, then they moved back to 12 players, then they moved back to 6 againExactly I don't get why people have to hate on croe. And since MCGamer V2 (November 2014) You only needed 6 players to start.
i played in the actually mcsg v2 and mcsg v1 not MCgaymer lolExactly I don't get why people have to hate on croe. And since MCGamer V2 (November 2014) You only needed 6 players to start.
MY THOUGHTS EXACTALLY LIKE MCGAMER SOUNDS SO BAD AND MCSG SOUNDS BAD-ASS AND LIKE YEAi played in the actually mcsg v2 and mcsg v1 not MCgaymer lol
necro (barely), but I want to say something.This is the thing that I see so many people having misunderstandings of. In cases like croe, people will go around saying he boosts because they beat him in a 1v1, therefore they're better and he's a no-good booster. These people not only anger me in the sense that they obviously don't know how to control themselves, but they do not know either how the leaderboards work. Never has it been that the top ranking players on the leaderboards were the best PvP'ers or players, with the exception of MAYBE the first few months of MCSG's existence.
All in all, I cease to understand why people care so much about this.