Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
As you said earlier, couldn't we just have a few servers with 'raffe voting' and a few without? It is a win/win for everyone; they get to play with the voting they want. If they are just playing for fun, and don't care what map they play - go to the raffle servers. If they want to try and play a certain map - go to the voting weight servers.To the people taking this thread off topic, please don't. Actually linking this debate as lots of great points are coming out! Thanks everyone.
Yeah but this still means the same maps will be chosen a lot. I think that the whole reason for this was so that people could play new maps.. Explore more maps.I'm not a huge fan of the raffled voting system. I saw that other people pointed out that a chunk of people on the server leave if there is a big gap between maps (I've seen a map in the 80s and others in single digits, and have a single digit one win). This just leaves a lot of people annoyed in the end, and they have to look for another server to play on with maps they like.
But as a possible revision: What if, when there is more than 50% of the vote for one map, we play that one, but if they are all divided pretty evenly, (where no map has over 50%), then the raffle voting gets put into place. I feel like that way if a map someone doesn't want to win has 73% of the votes, they can just leave before the game starts, allowing someone else to join who may enjoy the map. And when the support for the maps is spread evenly everyone has a chance to play their map.
Let me know if this doesn't make sense.
How about the other way around with weighted voting being a once a week thing. That way playing the same map over and over again is only on one day not all of them.Dedicate one day of the week to the raffle voting system.
For example make Friday; Raffle Day.
Also a lot of what people don't realise is a lot of people choose to vote last minute to choose the result that they want most.I personally really like this idea as the maps are more varied, and it's not always the same few maps over and over again. The system to me seems fine. I am 99% sure that it not set so that maps with less votes get chosen. Think about it like this.
10% Map 1
10% Map 2
10% Map 3
10% Map 4
60% Map 5.
People seem to think, look, this map has the largest probability, it must mean we will be playing Map 5! The way I think about it is:
I do not think of it as 60% Map 5, I think of it as 40% not Map 5. That way, it has a very high probability of it not being Map 5. Which makes more sense than if say you were thinking of it as the other way round.