1.7 Making a return?

[Eathuis]

I'd like to note that I'd much rather have 1.7 instead of 1.8 for my personal reasons (being awful at PvP in 1.8), but I notice that there would be serious complications in the present and the future.

That's all.

Especially with the 1.9 combat update, which knowing Mojang, won't be released within the next decade.

 

[Vinyl]

Especially with the 1.9 combat update, which knowing Mojang, won't be released within the next decade.

We'd need to update to the combat update regardless of the version we're on.

There's no real reason to hate the addition of 1.7 into the servers.

 

[TheOrhan]

yeap!

 

[CultHD]

holy crap i just realised invis fire is back, im willing to sacrifice my fps for iron bars and glowstone <33333

 

[Waffles]

apex strats are back!!!

 

[demonsushi]

SGC and QQ are outdated maps from mcsg that no one likes

This is such a false statement. The development that went into QQ is honestly so under looked, I can't even imagine how hard that must have been. I admit, it was laggy, but I played it on occasion. SGC is a little more upsetting to me, because those maps bring back so many memories for v1 players. Luckily those maps are still apart of normal SG.

Normally I'd have an opinion but honestly I cannot really form one worth sharing. So I'm just
going to bystand and read.

 

[4non]

What complications?

• Upgrading to 1.9 - it's going to be the same issue. Players will not want to update because they're already used to 1.7, and this has proven to be true. It's happened multiple times in the past: When 1.7 was released, people longed for 1.6 back. When 1.8 was released, people longed for 1.7 back. The staff gave in, I suppose.
• Staying in the past, as a network that attempts to remain remotely populated, is extremely difficult. It's true that there are outdated servers that are successful in Minecraft, but they only have very few players. This stays true with any game - do you see as many players on CS:S/CS 1.6 servers?
• Many maps will have to be removed, revamped, or somehow made exclusive to 1.8 players unnecessarily. Not only is this a huge waste of time for the Map Committee, but it also unfairly removes/remodels maps that people put time/effort into etc.

lmao, you must be new, nobody likes sg1 and sg2? What r u gonna say, valleyside is better than them? smh

SG1/SG2 are beautiful.

 

[CultHD]

• Upgrading to 1.9 - it's going to be the same issue. Players will not want to update because they're already used to 1.7, and this has proven to be true. It's happened multiple times in the past: When 1.7 was released, people longed for 1.6 back. When 1.8 was released, people longed for 1.7 back. The staff gave in, I suppose.
• Staying in the past, as a network that attempts to remain remotely populated, is extremely difficult. It's true that there are outdated servers that are successful in Minecraft, but they only have very few players. This stays true with any game - do you see as many players on CS:S/CS 1.6 servers?
• Many maps will have to be removed, revamped, or somehow made exclusive to 1.8 players unnecessarily. Not only is this a huge waste of time for the Map Committee, but it also unfairly removes/remodels maps that people put time/effort into etc.

SG1/SG2 are beautiful.

exactly.

 

[dq]

lmao, you must be new, nobody likes sg1 and sg2? What r u gonna say, valleyside is better than them? smh

SG2 is actually my favorite map tyvm

 

[CultHD]

SG2 is actually my favorite map tyvm

that's the point i was making.

 

[dq]

that's the point i was making.

That's why I said tyvm

 

[CultHD]

That's why I said tyvm

o i sensed sarcasm