LMAO
Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
LMAO
I'm saying that the majority of the unknown players voted "Yes". I didn't mean everyone.So I guess this makes me unknown?
I find this statement hardly true, there are a lot of players that are known that have voted yes.
It's still a risky accusation.I'm saying that the majority of the unknown players voted "Yes". I didn't mean everyone.
trust me pal i think i have a better understanding of where clans scrim than you do ^_^Hmm...tell me how many times you've been able to take out a team of 4+ with ease? oh wait... the amount of 4+ teams is a lot higher than people think. 2 teams, aren't that difficult, unless they gapple >.<.
I highly doubt clans actually scrim in 100-120. Most clans (I've been in a few), are going to scrim in 160+.
bruh. i was in some randy clans, and 1 good one. we scrimmed on CA, or on 150+ servers..trust me pal i think i have a better understanding of where clans scrim than you do ^_^
You cannot control the amount of teams in a game. I mean yes, you can, but it would just cause a lot of un-needed drama for MCG. Doing that would basically mean first come, first served.Limiting the amount of teams would be a good idea. Maybe limit it to two teams.
w0w okay just gonna call me bad at pvp w0wI feel like this is such a hard topic. You need to look at it from the perspective of your loyal players. Most of the people that complain of this are generally not good at PvP. I know you don't like to base mcsg decisions of this skill but look at it this way. Most of the people complaining are people that are not to great to start. And likely will loose a regular fight, never mind a team. So it's more of in issue over the amount of teams in one game. Limiting the amount of teams would be a good idea. Maybe limit it to two teams. And designate servers 175-200 (On Ca-Au maybe do the last 5 servers) on U.S and E.U for clan related activities and teams of three or more. This could be a solution to the problem.
What do you mean "First come first serve?" Nothing I said could make you think that.You cannot control the amount of teams in a game. I mean yes, you can, but it would just cause a lot of un-needed drama for MCG. Doing that would basically mean first come, first served.
Also, what would happen when a team dies? Couldn't another team just say they were the first team in the game?
I meant most people that complain (You seem good)w0w okay just gonna call me bad at pvp w0w
Sorry if I'm wrong, and if I am, please correct me, but how would you suppose having two teams per game work? How would they be able to tell you "You can't team with your friends because there is already two teams in here."What do you mean "First come first serve?" Nothing I said could make you think that.
I meant most people that complain (You seem good)
Limiting the amount of teams would be a good idea. Maybe limit it to two teams.