Community Opinion: Teaming

[Ephiza]

Do people honestly care that much about teams? If it's that big of a problem, you can just quit; get (more) skill; random team; or better yet, make some friends and play with them.

lol. if you random team, you suck. people complain about teams because they want to have fun playing solo, not worrying about getting 3v1'ed every damn game they play.

 

[MCOnThePCAndrew]

w0w okay just gonna call me bad at pvp w0w

Sorry if I'm wrong, and if I am, please correct me, but how would you suppose having two teams per game work? How would they be able to tell you "You can't team with your friends because there is already two teams in here."

*I may have misunderstood this.*

thats my fault I meant two members per team. Typos stink

 

[vlubba]

I'm in love with the idea servers 100+ are FFA it would make life so much easier like no more rage quits and non sense, But I don't think the masking/Steve skins are a great idea.

 

[Th1NgY | Will]

So this makes me unknown. w0w skrub ok

edit: thingy182 I've been in good clans VortexClan. no one scrims in servers above 150 lol

Then you haven't been in good clans. They always play on 100-200

 

[Ephiza]

Then you haven't been in good clans. They always play on 100-200

i dont think vortex is a bad clan..?

 

[Ceroria]

but... but.... If there are no teams.... then how.. how will I betray?

play on the non-FFA servers

As for this idea, I'm not totally against it, but not totally for it, there are pros and cons. A couple pros being that this would be very nice to play on and could make better use of out otherwise empty servers. Cons would be the obvious ones like people still trying to team and the fact that clan battles and scrimmages will be harder to get because of the lack of 50-100 extra empty servers to look for.

Lovin' the idea and the support it's getting, however!

 

[Th1NgY | Will]

i dont think vortex is a bad clan..?

Basically every single EU clan plays on 100+

 

[ThatPixel8tedGuy]

Do people honestly care that much about teams? If it's that big of a problem, you can just quit; get (more) skill; random team; or better yet, make some friends and play with them.

There are good players that could still get killed, teamed or not, they will have a chance of dying.

 

[Mike]

I agree. This will put MCG in the right direction! I hope this happen!

 

[ImJellyfish]

Make another gamemode called LSG LoneSurvivalGames and just take maybe 24 or 12 (however much you have on one server node) servers from each network to be the LSG servers nothing needs to be different but one rule for no teaming

done

 

[Ceroria]

Make another gamemode called LSG LoneSurvivalGames and just take maybe 24 or 12 (however much you have on one server node) servers from each network to be the LSG servers nothing needs to be different but one rule for no teaming

done

But the reason people want a solo Survival Games is so that it will count toward their statistics.

 

[Julius345]

But the reason people want a solo Survival Games is so that it will count toward their statistics.

Nope. I don't care if there will be new leaderboards or not. I just want to have fun and not get killed by teams of 4 all the time.