Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
The point of donors getting extra votes is to get what map they want. If they all vote for it, and it doesn't get chosen there is no point. This is why I believe they should change it back to the old voting system.This is honestly way better. Imagine in a poll that one map is 43% and one is 57%. One side is overcome by diamon donors that are teaming. The other side is the rest of the lobby, with a few exceptions. The map with 43% is voted, and 5 new people to this map love it, an always vote for it rather then the usual SG4 on the other side. Now, I'm not saying that overplayed maps aren't fun or good, but it gives other maps a chance and to see what the other maps are o MCSG.
But those are rarely the situations that are happening here.This is honestly way better. Imagine in a poll that one map is 43% and one is 57%. One side is overcome by diamon donors that are teaming. The other side is the rest of the lobby, with a few exceptions. The map with 43% is voted, and 5 new people to this map love it, an always vote for it rather then the usual SG4 on the other side. Now, I'm not saying that overplayed maps aren't fun or good, but it gives other maps a chance and to see what the other maps are o MCSG.
And it is also rare that the map with 3 votes beats one with 16...But those are rarely the situations that are happening here.
I get that. But when Holiday or Valleyside loses to a map like SG3 when it has 1 vote is irritating. That's the only reason I don't like it. But I do enjoy getting on my favorite maps such as SG2 or Rugged Lands because of it :3Really?? I love it! I was getting sick of playing SG4, TSG2 and SG Highway every game.