Mooclan
Forum God
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 6,358
- Reaction score
- 12,666
----- ----- -----
Risk versus reward.
That's one of the big things that the Survival Games is all about.
"Is the risk worth the reward if I go to this Tier 2 chest?"
"If I fight this undergeared team of two, will I win? What will I acquire from the kills?"
"If I take this chest route on Survival Games 4, what is the risk that someone else will kill me? If I don't die, what will I get out of it?"
"If I run to the Cornucopia, will I die?"
Really, there are a lot of "Risk vs. Reward" situations in Survival Games. It's been that way since the beginning, and will continue to be that way until the last server comes to a permanent stop.
Now, there's a big question that this revolves around
How does someone decide whether the reward is worth the reward?
Some might say that if there's a "50-50" chance of them dying, then they won't go. Some would go.
Others might try and keep track of how many people run in which directions.
And many would simply take the option that has the most rewards, even if the risk is astronomical.
So, as a player, how do you determine whether something is worth the risk?
What risks do you usually take, or not take? Where do you draw the line between "Do" and "Do not"?
Think about it. Cognitive thinking might help you more than you ever expected.