Nirmit|NirmitPlays
Diamond
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2013
- Messages
- 2,032
- Reaction score
- 2,095
I have a 41 won to 4,000 ratio I know I Am badYou do not have to have good stats to get in to Clans.
Example A:11% W/L
Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
I have a 41 won to 4,000 ratio I know I Am badYou do not have to have good stats to get in to Clans.
Example A:11% W/L
Wins, Ratio they both don't really matter, the only things clans really care about is your Level of PVP skill and or if they like you or not.I have a 41 won to 4,000 ratio I know I Am bad
YeahWins, Ratio they both don't really matter, the only things clans really care about is your Level of PVP skill and or if they like you or not.
So in other words, everyone has "bad stats"? Because if that is the case, even Gravey4rd does not have perfect or better-than-perfect stats, but he still holds his place at number one? I do not see how that is logical. Wins and/or ratios do not matter. The game is about strategy and skill. If you have both, and you find yourself doing well, then great! In my opinion, there are no "good" or " bad stats". It is all about the goal you set for yourself, and if you meet that goal, then that is all that matters because you know you are trying your absolute best to meet it.More losses than wins -_-
That was sarcasm, hence the -_-So in other words, everyone has "bad stats"? Because if that is the case, even Gravey4rd does not have perfect or better-than-perfect stats, but he still holds his place at number one? I do not see how that is logical. Wins and/or ratios do not matter. The game is about strategy and skill. If you have both, and you find yourself doing well, then great! In my opinion, there are no "good" or " bad stats". It is all about the goal you set for yourself, and if you meet that goal, then that is all that matters because you know you are trying your absolute best to meet it.
I'm offended. I have a 0/2 ratio.Anything below a 1/2 is unacceptable!!! I must constantly reset my stats until I get a 1/2 or people will judge me like omg omg I lost a game. Someone killed me he must be a hacker hax hax hax!1!!1!!!! Lets all spam report him so the mods chase him around for 10 minutes only to realize that he isn't actually hacking and we just wasted their time!!!'
/endrant
Then if you kill me you must be a hacker!!!I'm offended. I have a 0/2 ratio.
You are now my favourite moderator. c:Anything below a 1/2 is unacceptable!!! I must constantly reset my stats until I get a 1/2 or people will judge me like omg omg I lost a game. Someone killed me he must be a hacker hax hax hax!1!!1!!!! Lets all spam report him so the mods chase him around for 10 minutes only to realize that he isn't actually hacking and we just wasted their time!!!'
/endrant
mine.What exactly would you define as "bad stats"?
This has been mentioned many times before after the initial announcement of the Leaderboard Update, and the simple answer is no. And while it made more sense when people offered it as an alternative to the myth of a stats reset (I'm glad that died out), this proposal makes less sense.I have a proposal to ChadTheDJ and maybe Col_StaR can tell me about the topic if it is possible or not.
As you all know the leaderboard update still hasn't been active yet due to bugs and glitches. Everyone is hating on the staff team, so I think MCGamer sake a complementary free stats reset..... Only the people with bad stats will activate them, because for the legacy leaderboards they will lose their ranking.
....
I am Barack Obama and I approve this thread