Community Opinion: Teaming

[Metalclaw | Jordan]

You are Bluahwi, are you not....

No, why? My sig? it says 1337 I was going through pvpers channels

 

[Res]

No, why? My sig? it says 1337 I was going through pvpers channels

Oh sorry I just figured out Bluahwi is 101thecreator, now this is awkward. xD

 

[Metalclaw | Jordan]

Oh sorry I just figured out Bluahwi is 101thecreator, now this is awkward. xD

its ok, I get it alot.

 

[Res]

its ok, I get it alot.

If I got that alot I'd like it more than getting hackusated 10 times a day.

 

[Ephiza]

Oh sorry I just figured out Bluahwi is 101thecreator, now this is awkward. xD

Bluahwi is shanrr

 

[PurpleTacoEater]

My Idea Is Simple 1 Set Of Servers For Teaming
1 Set Of Servers For FFA
1 Set Of Servers For People That Go Solo But Dont Mind Teamers Now Everyones Happy

 

[RelentlessForce]

Nah man teams are eZpZ.

In all seriousness I think that having some FFA high servers wouldn't be a bad idea.

 

[TheTDevine5]

i dont think teaming should be banned from mcsg, but I do think it should have limits. I once played a game with a 10 player team, half of the game

 

[Fireworks]

i dont think teaming should be banned from mcsg, but I do think it should have limits. I once played a game with a 10 player team, half of the game

I believe a lot of people have the same thought as you, might as well try to clear it up.

They never said they were going to full out ban teams, they want to allocate some the current SG servers to being a FFA-only game. Teaming would be allowed in the servers not converted to this 'new' mode.

As for the recent argument going on, each side has it's good and bad. Most of the things that we think will happen if this was to occur is all speculation though, since this has never been done before, we don't know what kind of outcome is going to happen. For the servers to truly know what these servers will bring is to implement them.

As for my opinion of what should be done, has swayed after reading all 21 pages of this topic. I still stand on the side that doesn't like this idea, but I'm very interested in to what these servers could bring. I wouldn't like half of these servers to become FFA, that's just way too much. If we started with like, 15 or so servers that we're FFA as a Beta, and see what kind of issues they bring/solve, then we can base what should be done after we receive this data.

 

[Kraken]

The concept of have FFA only servers is a good one, however I think having certain servers in regular SG FFA only is going to cause some issues. I can see people forgetting that they are in a FFA only server, having innocently just clicked any sign that says lobby. If we do implement FFA only SG, I think it should be it's own game type. Furthermore, it all depends on how much realism we want to stick to, in relation to the movie/book. I think having a team is a great way to stick to the Hunger Games aspect of our system, as it forces you to kill your friends at the end....only one can win. Then again, we always help out our friends at deathmatch, even out the gear etc. So while I like the idea of having a FFA aspect to it, where we enforce now allowing teams, I really think it should be segregated from our long-loved SG, in it's own game type.

 

[FloppehFeesh]

You got nice points, but then comes a 10 team..a clan....a team of 2 hackers...there is a reason why these FFA servers are made and its for the better and MCSG isn't stating they are getting RID of teams, no, there will still be servers left for people to team and do what not

Well, a team of two hackers is already illegal. There are plenty of ways to handles teams of 10's and clans, but that is rare.

I am totally for well executed separate FFA-only servers.

 

[Tigerstain]

yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes a friggin million times yes bless you and your family amen thank you