Your first proposition is erroneous because God is not required for "good" to be in the world. Also good and evil don't actually manifest physically. I mean, I guess we can measure the rate and patterns of neuronal impulses which give rise to these apparent attributes, but you can't measure good and evil. Good and evil are completely subjective as well, which kills your argument from morality.
The problem with your assumptions about the bible. You assert that someone can interpret the bible in a way that is consistent with current scientific knowledge. However there are hundreds of other creation stories which contradict yours and you could also argue that they are supported (even though none of it is, just using your method of argument) by modern science.
Atheists don't hate God, nor do they reject him.
The Big Bang is NOT an explosion of light. It is the expansion of space. The Big Bang is also not the beginning according to a plethora of new pre-big bang models in physics.
Here are some I know of which don't require God.
Ekpryrotic Model- The universe is a 4d brane floating in a 12 dimensional hyperspace. There are many branes stacked ontop and they vibrate, every trillion years they touch and create a Big Bang.
Paper:
http://physics.princeton.edu/~steinh/vaasrev.pdf
Cyclic Model- Infinite Regress, the universe expands and contracts infinitely.
Paper:
http://gravity.psu.edu/outreach/articles/bigbounce.pdf
Or maybe we live in a computer simulation?
Or maybe we're Boltzmann brains or brains in vats.
Maybe a property of nothing is that it creates something?
Maybe time is slowing down?
Paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.02052
Maybe time is an illusion?
Paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0119.pdf
By the way, there are no logical arguments for God. So you're the illogical one.
The difference between an atheist and a theist is one tries to understand things, one just accepts them as true.
PS: I used to have similar views to you but I did more research and changed.