Scott
District 13
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2014
- Messages
- 2,359
- Reaction score
- 2,763
You have to take into account that not all hackers would be forgiven. Let's say there are 40 hackers banned daily. That's 1,200 hackers. Now let's say that 30% of them dispute their ban, since most of them will come on hack and then leave like and hack somewhere else. So, 360 people a month dispute it. Now let's say 30% of them are forgiven. That leaves 108 hackers left. For example, let's put 50 of those in American, 40 in Europe, and the 18 left in Australia. I'd say that's pretty easy to cover, considering that not all of them will be on at once and that.But imagine how many people moderators would have to supervise on even if it wasn't consistent?
I know it's completely hypothetical, but you could also limit the amount of people who can be forgiven by putting a cap on the amount of disputes accepted by previous hackers and only choosing the absolute best and most well-written disputes at the end of a week (or month).