Instead of map voting...

[VebbiHD]

Why don't you have only 1 map for each server, so:

Eu/Us 1-6: Map 1
Eu/Us 7-12: Map 2
Eu/Us 13-18: Map 3
Eu/Us 19-24 Map 4

Eu/Us 25: Map 1 (48 slot)
Eu/Us 26: Map 2 (48 slot)
Eu/Us 27: Map 3 (48 slot)
Eu/Us 28: Map 4 (48 slot)

Au 1: Map 1
Au 2: Map 2
Au 3: Map 3
Au 4: Map 4
Au 5-6 I'm not sure what to do, maybe voting?

This way people can play on the map they want to play on!

 

[thetruedozer]

Why don't you have only 1 map for each server, so:

Eu/Us 1-6: Map 1
Eu/Us 7-12: Map 2
Eu/Us 13-18: Map 3
Eu/Us 19-24 Map 4

Eu/Us 25: Map 1 (48 slot)
Eu/Us 26: Map 2 (48 slot)
Eu/Us 27: Map 3 (48 slot)
Eu/Us 28: Map 4 (48 slot)

Au 1: Map 1
Au 2: Map 2
Au 3: Map 3
Au 4: Map 4
Au 5-6 I'm not sure what to do, maybe voting?

This way people can play on the map they want to play on!

Could be good

 

[ShaunDepro]

Wouldn't work, what if I wanted to go on the AU 120 map and play a map 3, but it would only play 1.

I like voting as it is

 

[thetruedozer]

I don't mind, if this would be implemented I would like it, but I also like it the way it is

 

[static_nightmare]

ehh, but that could cause some overcrowded servers, and some empty ones. The voting system is fine in my opinion

 

[Rosza]

It would mean some servers would be empty because nobody would want to play that map and it would cost MCSG money for keeping up the servers even though nobody actually played them. If a new map came out all the new map servers would be overcrowded which wouldn't be too good :/

 

[Rashirim]

servers would always be crowneded the ones with the most popular maps so i like the voting system i dont think id want to move servers every game

 

[Dean]

I'm sorry, but this won't be happening.

 

[Valethar]

Won't happen. We'd have several servers full and several empty.

 

[Hystericallify]

I don't think this would happen, more maps will be coming.