• Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.

Annual Survival Games Tournament!

Would You Like For There To Be Some Kind of Tournament?


  • Total voters
    27

OnlyMathias

Peacekeeper
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
1,678
Reaction score
847
This Probably so like a Bad Idea but to have this idea work I am thinking have 24 servers. (the 576 People (24*24) would be randomly chosen from the Forums (unless we can find a way to contact people not on the forums)) Would all be in a game then the 24 victors would compete in a Map that would be Voted upon by the Community. Then the final 24 players would wait 3 days to have the final match. -- Thats just my thoughts on how this works but the problem with this is people could have a bad game so a longer harder way to do this is people have to play 5 games and gain points based on where they lost so 24th gets 1 points 23th gets 2 and so forth. Longer but allows for people to not be kicked out of the Tournament because of one bad game. I know this is long and probably not the most efficient but I think with this method the Tournament get the community more involved because it would last longer. Making it annual could make it lets say twice a year that would cause people to train in the gaps or train for one of the Tournaments and fight in the next. But the only thing is then those 24 players would have the same problem that I want to prevent with the 576 so how would the last round work would it just be one round winner takes all? That is what i think or it could be completely based off Points earned by placing. But Knowing What the heads of Mscg will do would make it easier to see what we should do.
 

Punchy_01

Experienced
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
397
Reaction score
205
This Probably so like a Bad Idea but to have this idea work I am thinking have 24 servers. (the 576 People (24*24) would be randomly chosen from the Forums (unless we can find a way to contact people not on the forums)) Would all be in a game then the 24 victors would compete in a Map that would be Voted upon by the Community. Then the final 24 players would wait 3 days to have the final match. -- Thats just my thoughts on how this works but the problem with this is people could have a bad game so a longer harder way to do this is people have to play 5 games and gain points based on where they lost so 24th gets 1 points 23th gets 2 and so forth. Longer but allows for people to not be kicked out of the Tournament because of one bad game. I know this is long and probably not the most efficient but I think with this method the Tournament get the community more involved because it would last longer. Making it annual could make it lets say twice a year that would cause people to train in the gaps or train for one of the Tournaments and fight in the next. But the only thing is then those 24 players would have the same problem that I want to prevent with the 576 so how would the last round work would it just be one round winner takes all? That is what i think or it could be completely based off Points earned by placing. But Knowing What the heads of Mscg will do would make it easier to see what we should do.
This is nice, having the best of a game get chosen for a final game of the best 24
 

kstorm2

Experienced
Joined
May 16, 2013
Messages
297
Reaction score
142
This Probably so like a Bad Idea but to have this idea work I am thinking have 24 servers. (the 576 People (24*24) would be randomly chosen from the Forums (unless we can find a way to contact people not on the forums)) Would all be in a game then the 24 victors would compete in a Map that would be Voted upon by the Community. Then the final 24 players would wait 3 days to have the final match. -- Thats just my thoughts on how this works but the problem with this is people could have a bad game so a longer harder way to do this is people have to play 5 games and gain points based on where they lost so 24th gets 1 points 23th gets 2 and so forth. Longer but allows for people to not be kicked out of the Tournament because of one bad game. I know this is long and probably not the most efficient but I think with this method the Tournament get the community more involved because it would last longer. Making it annual could make it lets say twice a year that would cause people to train in the gaps or train for one of the Tournaments and fight in the next. But the only thing is then those 24 players would have the same problem that I want to prevent with the 576 so how would the last round work would it just be one round winner takes all? That is what i think or it could be completely based off Points earned by placing. But Knowing What the heads of Mscg will do would make it easier to see what we should do.
I like this. I think it would be better to just have someone be eliminated when they lose, because that's just generally the way tournaments work. But hey, whatever the MCSG staff want to do i'd be happy with.
Hellgames....
Neat, but not what i'm talking about.
 

HalfSquirrel

Diamond
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
10,839
Reaction score
6,219
Hellgames....
Hell Games is a single game, not a tournament (or not what I think a tournament is).
This Probably so like a Bad Idea but to have this idea work I am thinking have 24 servers. (the 576 People (24*24) would be randomly chosen from the Forums (unless we can find a way to contact people not on the forums)) Would all be in a game then the 24 victors would compete in a Map that would be Voted upon by the Community. Then the final 24 players would wait 3 days to have the final match. -- Thats just my thoughts on how this works but the problem with this is people could have a bad game so a longer harder way to do this is people have to play 5 games and gain points based on where they lost so 24th gets 1 points 23th gets 2 and so forth. Longer but allows for people to not be kicked out of the Tournament because of one bad game. I know this is long and probably not the most efficient but I think with this method the Tournament get the community more involved because it would last longer. Making it annual could make it lets say twice a year that would cause people to train in the gaps or train for one of the Tournaments and fight in the next. But the only thing is then those 24 players would have the same problem that I want to prevent with the 576 so how would the last round work would it just be one round winner takes all? That is what i think or it could be completely based off Points earned by placing. But Knowing What the heads of Mscg will do would make it easier to see what we should do.
I think there are many ways to do it, and you don't necessarily need 576 people. You could take the top X amount of people (say top 3 for example) from every game, and you would need a lot less people. I also think there should be qualifier rounds so that anyone can try and participate, but only the best can really be in the tournament itself.
 

kstorm2

Experienced
Joined
May 16, 2013
Messages
297
Reaction score
142
Hell Games is a single game, not a tournament (or not what I think a tournament is).


I think there are many ways to do it, and you don't necessarily need 576 people. You could take the top X amount of people (say top 3 for example) from every game, and you would need a lot less people. I also think there should be qualifier rounds so that anyone can try and participate, but only the best can really be in the tournament itself.
Yeah there you go. They should just make you a mod and put you in charge of doing it :)
 

HalfSquirrel

Diamond
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
10,839
Reaction score
6,219
Yeah there you go. They should just make you a mod and put you in charge of doing it :)
Why would you have to be a mod to be in charge of this? You can make your own event just like this if you want! :p
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
242,192
Messages
2,449,550
Members
523,972
Latest member
Atasci