DeathMatch starts easrlier

[tom00117]

Right now DeathMatch doesn't start until the last 3 people.
But I think this number should be changed to last 4 people.
5 would be too much but 4 I think is just right!
What do you guys think!!

 

[Voei]

Think it's a good idea. It would stop the unfair 2vs1 fights...

 

[tom00117]

Think it's a good idea. It would stop the unfair 2vs1 fights...

EXACTLY!

 

[DonnieHD]

I agree! 4 people is better

 

[BetaPuffle]

it would make deathmatch's fun say it was team vs team

 

[OnlyMathias]

Ok this I can see is a good idea but then I am not always a team but when I am a 2 person treat me do gang up on the last guy but when we are a 3 man team then it is the same thing. If you play SG 1 you might have to wait all the way to death match and I've done this a few times and the only thing I don't like is it is only 4 people but its big and messy. People we attack then even though they don't team it's chaotic because one hits you runs then the next guy jumps at you. It gets cluttered and you have to fight a triangle and that's still hard. Just the other day I did in fact beat 2 full iron diamond sword people (they are a team) and I was 6.5 armpit bars sword sword. So I do not think that we should change the amount of people because then you well no doubt just have to try win harder fights that you probably could have won if it was merely 2 people.

 

[Otto]

Since Survival Games is a parody of Hunger Games then it should be 3 because the final "death match" in Hunger Games was with Katniss, Peter and Cato, 3 people!