How about.....

[Toa-Rex]

How about starving to death 'cause if you don't get food you'll get low on health and die anyway so yeah

 

[Kezzer]

I feel that it is fine the way it is as low hunger means you cant regen and cant sprint and you go to 5 hearts so you are easy to kill as it is. The current system just gives you a chance to get back in the game

 

[TheJustHellooo]

Sometimes you just don't get food in your usual chest run. Dying should not be a consequence.

 

[duckluv321]

:O Making the survival games even more intense? Personally, I could go either way because as TheJustHellooo said, you might not get food on your chest route and dying shouldn't be a consequence, but at the same time, you might not get a weapon, and death IS the consequence, BUT it could eliminate campers.

TL;DR- It's debatable.

 

[RC_4777]

:O Making the survival games even more intense? Personally, I could go either way because as TheJustHellooo said, you might not get food on your chest route and dying shouldn't be a consequence, but at the same time, you might not get a weapon, and death IS the consequence, BUT it could eliminate campers.

TL;DR- It's debatable.

Yus, dis is da answer of RC.

 

[James.D]

A human can last several days without food and the games last like a maximum of 2 days sooo?

 

[Toast]

A human can last several days without food and the games last like a maximum of 2 days sooo?

A human can last 10 days without food suffering little to no health problems, but 30 days with thinks like going blind, going deaf, loss of skin, loss of vital organs, loss of limbs, loss of... Well you get the picture xP.

Anyway, though un-realistic, this would be a great idea, as 1 day in the Survival Games=1 week in the Hunger Games would simulate this.

 

[RC_4777]

A human can last several days without food and the games last like a maximum of 2 days sooo?

Well try fighting after not eating for 2 days.

 

[supermuddypuddle]

:O Making the survival games even more intense? Personally, I could go either way because as TheJustHellooo said, you might not get food on your chest route and dying shouldn't be a consequence, but at the same time, you might not get a weapon, and death IS the consequence, BUT it could eliminate campers.

TL;DR- It's debatable.

My guess is that you were'nt around when mobs actually spawned

 

[duckluv321]

My guess is that you were'nt around when mobs actually spawned

Actually I was. I was a total noob back then and 90% of the time, they were the cause of my death

 

[JaysWing]

*walks around with 0 food, 5 hearts, and nothing AT ALL*

oh man this game sucks...

*watches guy with good stuff fall off a building because he's le derp*

 

[ManOfTheBread]

I've won at least 20-30 rounds on breeze island while starving, and not getting a weapon, within the first day. Although I'm 50-50 split on this, as this could potentially remove campers, and could speed up games. Although, it could speed up games, xD I know it sounds confusing. In some ways it's a good thing that MCSG rounds have become faster, but honestly, do we need them any quicker? I mean I guarantee you that if you ask 10 noobs what this is based off of, at least 3-4 of them will not know the answer (hunger games).