• Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.

Clan rules update!

ImTheNarwhal

District 13
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
4,730
Reaction score
1,544
wtf is the point in having trial members then? Other than that its good =)
Playing trial members in actual battles would show how they play under more pressure...right? Back when Ascendancy was active, being a trial was less about how good you are but how you fit in; meaning it was the best possible way to test a person. I understand clans function differently so it may be something to reconsider once people have adjusted to the updated rules.
 

sami

Survivor
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
189
Reaction score
42
"- Supervision for MCGamer staff in clan battles is no longer necessary but a senior member of clan staff must make all rulings on said battle"

Atleast if "screenshare is required" was a rule by now... but i got told by some mcgamer mods that "Screenshare is not required" ..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caz

Noah|Vendue

demon
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
2,270
Reaction score
1,568
Our view was that it would make more sense to allow clan leaders to decide who they wanted to play rather than us forcing them to only play full members. If clans end up deciding they don't want to play with trials the rule can be adjusted accordingly.
That's very true. But the meaning of Trial is for them to be tested into getting a shot into the clan. Basically Trial-Members can now play in battles? What if they just applied to throw? You never know man, playing Trials in battles is sketchy because A) You don't usually know them that well. B) You can't trust them fully because you don't have experience with playing with this trial, and C) This is destorying the purpose of being 'Trial' and now will we have to make everyone an applicant until accepted as member? Is Member supposed to be higher than Trial Member now? I'm not really trying to bash at all but I think this rule might be a little to big of a change for the clan community to follow, but I love all the other rules you stated other than that one. :)
 

Crinkle

Platinum
Joined
Oct 11, 2014
Messages
1,670
Reaction score
1,397
Playing trial members in actual battles would show how they play under more pressure...right? Back when Ascendancy was active, being a trial was less about how good you are but how you fit in; meaning it was the best possible way to test a person. I understand clans function differently so it may be something to reconsider once people have adjusted to the updated rules.
That's what scrims are for, to test how good your trials are. If they don't do so well, they get denied. Is that not enough pressure for them?
 

ImTheNarwhal

District 13
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
4,730
Reaction score
1,544
"- Supervision for MCGamer staff in clan battles is no longer necessary but a senior member of clan staff must make all rulings on said battle"

Atleast if "screenshare is required" was a rule by now... but i got told by some mcgamer mods that "Screenshare is not required" ..
Screensharing will more than likely never be a thing. I for sure am not a fan of forcing people to install 3rd party software for me to then go browsing through their private files ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

That's very true. But the meaning of Trial is for them to be tested into getting a shot into the clan. Basically Trial-Members can now play in battles? What if they just applied to throw? You never know man, playing Trials in battles is sketchy because A) You don't usually know them that well. B) You can't trust them fully because you don't have experience with playing with this trial, and C) This is destorying the purpose of being 'Trial' and now will we have to make everyone an applicant until accepted as member? Is Member supposed to be higher than Trial Member now? I'm not really trying to bash at all but I think this rule might be a little to big of a change for the clan community to follow, but I love all the other rules you stated other than that one. :)
Our idea behind the idea was to give the clan leaders the choice to play trials. Under no circumstances is it compulsory - it's completely optional.
 

Crinkle

Platinum
Joined
Oct 11, 2014
Messages
1,670
Reaction score
1,397
Our idea behind the idea was to give the clan leaders the choice to play trials. Under no circumstances is it compulsory - it's completely optional.
I understand it is a choice, however I feel as if this may cause problems such as trials becoming upset how they are not playing in battles. A trial member isn't a real member in the clan, so why are they allowed to play in battles? Again, I understand it's a choice but this makes utterly no sense. I do like the other additions, but I don't agree with this one.
 

Param

Quantum
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
842
Reaction score
520
Why are you guys making such a fuss about trials being able to play in clan battles, maybe you haven't played EU. If you don't want to play the trial then don't. I do agree with Narwhal that putting a trial into a real battle does add on pressure but now a days, everyone you recruit is pretty much not new and are all old players. I have yet to meet a new player who has the same skill level as some higher up clans. The trial thing doesn't bother me personally because I usually never deal with trials in the first place, it's either their good and wanted or they aren't. The only other rule I may have difficulty with may be the 48 hour rule but that's only because I'm quite busy and I only like to resume when I find a suitable time so I probably wont concern myself with that rule.
 

MCunbreakable

Survivor
Joined
Apr 7, 2015
Messages
51
Reaction score
35
That's what scrims are for, to test how good your trials are. If they don't do so well, they get denied. Is that not enough pressure for them?
Crinkkkkkkkle members never take scrims seriously which makes it like impossible to see how a trial member does good or not. Play your trial at 4-0/3-0/3-1 or whatever and its not like its really a bad thing...
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
242,193
Messages
2,449,633
Members
523,972
Latest member
Atasci