Health Reader/Mod Check In's

[CPSparklez]

Hey! My IGN is CPSparklez and I would be happy if you guys were to add a new Health Type of Reader in Game. I came from a Server called Nexus (MCSG is way better) and I saw when you spectate, you can see that Hearts of a person. I think this would be a great idea in order to know the person's hearts and/or knowing if the person is regen hacking. (I do understand MCSG has enhanced Xime With kicking Regen Hackers but I'm just saying just in case) This is how the Nexus has improved and banned all there Regen Hackers. Moving on to our Second Topic is Mod Check In's. If I was a mod, I would properly do the work of making the server better by banning Hackers on the spot. I'm not saying that Mods aren't doing there work but I believe that Mod's should regularly check in games for Hackers because it happens about 50 % Of the time that there are hackers in the game. So if any Admins or even Chad if you are reading this, please make a meeting with your Mods and tell them to regularly Check In Games.

Thank You For Your Time Reading this
- Chris (CPSparklez)

 

[Trilexium]

Hey! My IGN is CPSparklez and I would be happy if you guys were to add a new Health Type of Reader in Game. I came from a Server called Nexus (MCSG is way better) and I saw when you spectate, you can see that Hearts of a person. I think this would be a great idea in order to know the person's hearts and/or knowing if the person is regen hacking. (I do understand MCSG has enhanced Xime With kicking Regen Hackers but I'm just saying just in case) This is how the Nexus has improved and banned all there Regen Hackers. Moving on to our Second Topic is Mod Check In's. If I was a mod, I would properly do the work of making the server better by banning Hackers on the spot. I'm not saying that Mods aren't doing there work but I believe that Mod's should regularly check in games for Hackers because it happens about 50 % Of the time that there are hackers in the game. So if any Admins or even Chad if you are reading this, please make a meeting with your Mods and tell them to regularly Check In Games.

Thank You For Your Time Reading this
- Chris (CPSparklez)

Most of the time, moderators are in the hub, monitoring chat and keeping a lookout for anyone requesting help. It is stated that moderators are expected to hop from server to server, maintaining order. Hackers can only be banned if there's sufficient evidence to convict them of hacking, and the first offense for hacking is a 7 day tempban.

This health-display idea would be a good idea, but I think limiting it to spectators-only would be a good idea- part of the fun is estimating your enemy's health in-game, and seeing their health removes this aspect of the game.

Good ideas.

 

[MoLoToV]

Hey! My IGN is CPSparklez and I would be happy if you guys were to add a new Health Type of Reader in Game. I came from a Server called Nexus (MCSG is way better) and I saw when you spectate, you can see that Hearts of a person. I think this would be a great idea in order to know the person's hearts and/or knowing if the person is regen hacking. (I do understand MCSG has enhanced Xime With kicking Regen Hackers but I'm just saying just in case) This is how the Nexus has improved and banned all there Regen Hackers. Moving on to our Second Topic is Mod Check In's. If I was a mod, I would properly do the work of making the server better by banning Hackers on the spot. I'm not saying that Mods aren't doing there work but I believe that Mod's should regularly check in games for Hackers because it happens about 50 % Of the time that there are hackers in the game. So if any Admins or even Chad if you are reading this, please make a meeting with your Mods and tell them to regularly Check In Games.

Thank You For Your Time Reading this
- Chris (CPSparklez)

We, moderators, usually play a few games aswell apart from moderating and when we come across a hacker or when someone let us know that there is a hacker in the game we will do our best to get sufficient evidence of the hacker to be able to perform a ban.

We also host so called "sweeps" where we spectate random games with a large amount of moderators spread over all the lobbys.

You can help us alot by eitherway reporting the hacker by recording them yourself and making a report about it. Or you could contact a moderator ( teamspeak would be the easiest ) so he/she can deal with the hacker.

Now, for being able to see the health of a player while spectating, in my opinion it's a bad idea. It makes teams having an advantage even after one of the two ( or more ) died, as they could easily tell the still alive team mates how low a certain person is. Therefore I think it shouldn't be implented.

 

[soggypickle]

This isn't necessary as it would provide advantages to people who have spectators helping them on TS or Skype. A while back, this would've been a good tool for catching regen hackers, but we've removed those permanently by other means. It's not very likely seeing the health of players will ever be incorperated in the MCSG gametype, however, if you prefer PvPing with that as an availability, you can try out our Battleground gametype, accessible by clicking the firework in your compass menu.

 

[CPSparklez]

We, moderators, usually play a few games aswell apart from moderating and when we come across a hacker or when someone let us know that there is a hacker in the game we will do our best to get sufficient evidence of the hacker to be able to perform a ban.

We also host so called "sweeps" where we spectate random games with a large amount of moderators spread over all the lobbys.

You can help us alot by eitherway reporting the hacker by recording them yourself and making a report about it. Or you could contact a moderator ( teamspeak would be the easiest ) so he/she can deal with the hacker.

Now, for being able to see the health of a player while spectating, in my opinion it's a bad idea. It makes teams having an advantage even after one of the two ( or more ) died, as they could easily tell the still alive team mates how low a certain person is. Therefore I think it shouldn't be implented.

Thank You For Replying

 

[Jon | Lqzer]

Question answered; thread locked.