Instead of Flint and Steel...

[ToeKnee]

Instead of flint and steel, can we use flame charges? They can actually stack, and it won't fill up in your inventory Maybe four flame charges in a chest? Since the flint and steel only has 4 durability.

 

[themastern00b]

The only problem is, people will be able to spam the crap out of it. You could have a stack of 64 fire charges, and that would just be extremely cheap.

 

[ToeKnee]

The only problem is, people will be able to spam the crap out of it. You could have a stack of 64 fire charges, and that would just be extremely cheap.

Oh, well dang

 

[1qw3er5t6y]

If its not broke, dont fix it.

 

[ToeKnee]

If its not broke, dont fix it.

That doesn't even make sense here.

 

[RC_4777]

The only problem is, people will be able to spam the crap out of it. You could have a stack of 64 fire charges, and that would just be extremely cheap.

While I don't think this change is necessary, it's not like you can't just have a billion flint and steel either.

 

[Chiller4]

Fire charges are so much more delayed than Fns though

 

[Mooclan]

As a FnS spammer (LOL) I would like this, but..

If its not broke, dont fix it.

dis ^

As it is, Flint and Steel is completely fine. Having a massive stack of place-able flames would be....... sooooooooooooooooo overpowered.

Also, how would you craft them?

 

[1qw3er5t6y]

That doesn't even make sense here.

Neither does you signature, but nobody is complaining.

 

[Canaan]

Fire Charges have a 1 to 2 second delay.

Fire charges are so much more delayed than Fns though

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What he said here

 

[UpdatinStatus]

no

 

[Canaan]

no

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
God Has Spoken Again.