What do you consider a "quality" post?

[RC_4777]

Which is why most people include a TL;DR sentence at the end

But many don't, and it's rarely a full thought. An overall shorter post would allow for full idea development and shorter length.

 

[Justin / Bullet]

Well,
I don't really post on these forums about anything other than clans and teams, really. I enjoy competitive clan play, and that's what I normally read.

So, what I define as a quality post would probably be a promising update on something related to clans and whatnot; it's all based on your preference and opinion.

However, when I'm reading other threads in the "New Posts" section of the forums, what I find in a quality post is quite different.

On anything non-clan related, I enjoy more detailed posts. So, what gives a post detail? To me, a detailed post has to not only get out the writer's point across, but also do it efficiently. Efficiency can be defined in my books as using:

• Proper grammar
• Paragraphs c;
• Not TOO long, but that's all my preference.
• Possibly a little entertaining; who likes to read a boring post anyways?
• COLOR JAAA

There's multiple sections on these forums in which a "quality post" could be very different. For me, I personally enjoy reading clan threads and posts more ;p but posting on these type of threads and reading through them doesn't hurt.

Cya l8r sk8r