Unfair Diamonds

[Stijn]

Because I was to lazy to read all the posts on this thread I just have one thing to say.
It should not be removed, with some tactic in my first game ever I killed a guy with a wooden sword while he had a diamond one. >.>

 

[Rtzon]

I feel that the chests are fine how they are right now.

 

[BottleGnomes]

diamond only does half a heart more than iron...

 

[Ck400]

A IDIOTIC IDEA
THIS IS

 

[purplepieman]

*AN

But yea, the point of holding the corn is that it is worth it! If you don't want someone to have the valuables there, go take them yourself.

 

[MPMG]

I disagree, i think there should still be diamonds, BUT i think that the whole chest system where cornucopia is better stuff and the chests around has crap stuff should be reversed where cornucopia has stone axes and leather armour, and the sponsor chests around the map have diamonds and iron armour

 

[jefeperro]

i just killed a guy who had a diamond sword and i only had a stone axe...
I stalked him until he found an opponent with alot of armor and an iron sword and let them duke it out.... then I swooped in for the kill after the other guy took down his health.
Although diamonds are overpowered, they are not impossible to beat...
If anything I think you should get a diamond for every 10 chests you open... that could make it more fair?

 

[OmniFlare]

2 points i want to make for this issue, Despite my dislike for diamonds.

1) i have had a diamond sword 3 times, and yet have to win a game. Im not a bad player, its just pther people are better than me.

2) If diamonds are banned from play then iron will become the new diamond and it's the same thing all over again.

 

[RansomHD]

only seen diamond lose 5 times and nearly all of them were 2v1 situations