duckluv321
District 13
- Joined
- May 6, 2012
- Messages
- 4,469
- Reaction score
- 8,463
Alright, now that I know what you mean, I prefer our current system. This idea is really confusing, honestly. And our current one makes more sense.
Right now, we basically have this system, but in less quantity. We have a bounty of selected maps permanently (can be removed), and these are on all the servers. These are of course subject to change, and can be removed for dislike upon new maps being added.
This idea really only changed the amount of maps on the server, and allows for only 2 new maps monthly, which could become forced, and allow in sub-par maps submitted in that month onto the servers because there wasn't any competition, and they needed to fill the slots.
The way I see it, it's lessening the amount of maps we currently have, and limiting us/forcing us to have 2 new maps a month. We already have a variation of this system, which seems to be working as is right now.
Good idea, just don't think it makes much sense
Right now, we basically have this system, but in less quantity. We have a bounty of selected maps permanently (can be removed), and these are on all the servers. These are of course subject to change, and can be removed for dislike upon new maps being added.
This idea really only changed the amount of maps on the server, and allows for only 2 new maps monthly, which could become forced, and allow in sub-par maps submitted in that month onto the servers because there wasn't any competition, and they needed to fill the slots.
The way I see it, it's lessening the amount of maps we currently have, and limiting us/forcing us to have 2 new maps a month. We already have a variation of this system, which seems to be working as is right now.
Good idea, just don't think it makes much sense