sasboy123
Survivor
- Joined
- May 4, 2013
- Messages
- 223
- Reaction score
- 18
really now....More than you would think, i'm sure there are a lot of people in this community who have hacked and turned it around. But those names are for staff eyes only
Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
really now....More than you would think, i'm sure there are a lot of people in this community who have hacked and turned it around. But those names are for staff eyes only
So you think dealting evidence deserves a second chance?I believe everyone should get a second chance. Maybe they were being stupid or someone got on their account. But whatever the situation was, after they goofed the 1st time they get a second chance to redeem themselves and make up for their mistake.
Although I do agree with this idea, I've seen hackers stop hacking after their ban, ALSO there is something people don't see about the "Deleting Evidence" issue, example: Say someone is a professional DDoS'er, and someone finally gets evidence to take him down, but then the player deletes the evidence and the DDoS'er can get unbanned because there was no evidence to back his ban up.Look guys, I have recorded and reported countless hackers on the servers, only for them to either not be banned, or come back after their week suspension and keep hacking. Now I know MCgamer has a really good staff team. But their is a point where we have to realize that a little warning wont change a hackers opinion. they don't get it. This is why I suggest permaban for obvious hacking or permaban on second offence of hacks. It would keep the servers far cleaner. The people who hack on minecraft are as low as you will find, and that's not something that I think MCgamer should be letting swim in their pool.
thanks
Yes but If some is a mega hacker and running everyones fun and then just comes back in a week and does it again for a bit I think it should not be 1 week but 1 month or 3 monthsAlthough I do agree with this idea, I've seen hackers stop hacking after their ban, ALSO there is something people don't see about the "Deleting Evidence" issue, example: Say someone is a professional DDoS'er, and someone finally gets evidence to take him down, but then the player deletes the evidence and the DDoS'er can get unbanned because there was no evidence to back his ban up.
If a hacker comes back and hacks after being banned for a week he is perm banned.Yes but If some is a mega hacker and running everyones fun and then just comes back in a week and does it again for a bit I think it should not be 1 week but 1 month or 3 months
yes I know that.....If a hacker comes back and hacks after being banned for a week he is perm banned.
HAHAHAHHA You dont even know dude you dont even knowSure not as many as eu, but I would still say 1 in 5 games has a hacker
I know what hackers are, and yes I appreciate that eu gets heaps of hackers, so yeah I knowHAHAHAHHA You dont even know dude you dont even know
no because you play au so you don't know what is it like to have hackers every game you just know about it not how it feelsI know what hackers are, and yes I appreciate that eu gets heaps of hackers, so yeah I know
And It's not just hackers in every game, usually on EU it's like 4-5 hackers every game xDno because you play au so you don't know what is it like to have hackers every game you just know about it not how it feels