Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
Haha! xDCLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORSSSSSS
xD
xDD!!!!Haha! xD
unprofessionally being on their side? for one, I wanted it to be 3-1 because I thought that this was most representative of what happened on the day. HOWEVER, the other staff members voted and it turned out to be a split between 3-1 and 2-0. I then decided that if Fine posted sufficient proof that he wasn't auto clicking, that it would be 3-1, if he didnt, it would be 2-0. he posted a staccato recording with 1-2 second bursts of like 12cps, contradicting his 10 second long video of him getting a stable 16+ cps. I haven't been on to let him call me, but he has had ample time to provide proof and he hasn't done itCould someone from staff please explain to me why we are going to play against Rasclarts AGAIN when we've already won 4-0 completely fair and square. You're saying it's because you think FineMC is using macros, yet you refuse to let him call you on skype and show his clickspeed ( which he has done with the members in our clan, therefore we beilive him ) and he has even uploaded 2 videos, even though they aren't the greatest to prove himself, but still, I don't see why he can't just call you on skype...Scout has even said that the logs can be caused by lag which makes it even less fair to have this redo. To me, it all just seems like Rasclarts begging for a redo because they won't accept the loss, and Austin unproffesionaly being on their side in the matter. ( so is most staff, since everyone loves Rasclarts and they're known ). I would really like a good explanation to how this is fair, Thank you.
PS: Also, please explain why it should be 2-0? If anything it should be 3-1 but we should have gotten the 4-0 win.
Sorry to ask but how was their an option for 2-0? For which reason?unprofessionally being on their side? for one, I wanted it to be 3-1 because I thought that this was most representative of what happened on the day. HOWEVER, the other staff members voted and it turned out to be a split between 3-1 and 2-0. I then decided that if Fine posted sufficient proof that he wasn't auto clicking, that it would be 3-1, if he didnt, it would be 2-0. he posted a staccato recording with 1-2 second bursts of like 12cps, contradicting his 10 second long video of him getting a stable 16+ cps. I haven't been on to let him call me, but he has had ample time to provide proof and he hasn't done it
edit: Scout was one of the staff that wanted it to be 2-0
he got logs in two rounds, 3 logs total. this therefore calls for a round dq and then a blacklist of the player, however I wasn't there to enforce this. SO, in retrospect, there is either two redos (2-0) or one dq and one round counted (3-1)Sorry to ask but how was their an option for 2-0? For which reason?
i'm at university and am barely ever on my computer, upload proper evidence that you can click 16cps like you did in your first upload, with audio, because your recent audio alone just proves that you cheat tbhBtw i do ask to call u on skype but you never reply to me and the only one who acctually replies to me is Scout.
PS: I was ill this weekend and i told you that i couldn't upload until Friday, 4 days later u tell me when i'm about to go to hospital that i have to uplaod on that day.