Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
Yes but lets be realistic.... it be pay to play if that was apart of auL3L it's sad to say that this is actually true ;_;
I don't see how this could be against EULA, especially because there are servers that make you pay for the whitelist, for exampleOne word : EULA.
You are allowed to charge for acces to your server. However, it's not allowed to have places in your server which non-paying player can't get to while the paying Players can.I don't see how this could be against EULA, especially because there are servers that make you pay for the whitelist, for example
Awh, didn't know that... InterestingYou are allowed to charge for acces to your server. However, it's not allowed to have places in your server which non-paying player can't get to while the paying Players can.
By doing this, it would reduce the amount of space for both sides to play. Along with that, it would make donor perks useless since donors would have to struggle to get into the donor servers themselves. It would overall make it tougher for everyone to join and make donors perks more useless. The donors paid for their perks so they shouldn't have to have a tougher time joining servers
- Having only donor/non-donor servers
^^^^Here is a quote from the No No Suggestions thread (Which I recommend reading before you post a suggestion)
In case you want to give the full thread a read, here is a link. http://www.mcgamer.net/threads/no-no-suggestions-updated-read-before-posting.32625/
Thread locked? Ceroria Yannick