- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
- Messages
- 1,260
- Reaction score
- 6,722
I saw this on a friend's FB feed today.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...or-threat-american-airlines-article-1.1755809
I was particularly drawn to this story because of its similarities on things that happen around this community. The Internet offers the illusion of anonymity whilst simultaneously removing certain aspects of communication (e.g. subtleties in nuance and humor), so what could be intended as a joke could easily be misinterpreted as a serious statement. Alternatively, individuals who are embolded by the illusion of anonymity will believe that they are free from consequence, make legitimate threats, and then back-track in order to save themselves from consequences they thought they were invulnerable against. Whether it's admitting to hacks, threatening to DDoS, or outright saying that someone is going to slit my throat while I'm sleeping, it's sometimes difficult to tell what's sarcastic and what's humorous.
At the same time, how does one react to something like that? Is it better to err on the side of safety and assume that all statements are legitimate? Or is it better to write off any threats over the internet as empty attacks emboldened by some internet toughguy?
Which brings me to this case, and the current discussion question for the thread: did this girl deserve to be arrested for the tweet?
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...or-threat-american-airlines-article-1.1755809
TL;DR: 14 year old girl tweets a terrorist threat to American Airlines, says it's a joke, ends up getting arrested.A 14-year-old Dutch girl who threatened a terrorist attack in a tweet to American Airlines was arrested in Rotterdam on Monday — but that didn't stop a copycat from tweeting a similar threat to another airline.
A Twitter user named "Sarah" wrote on Twitter over the weekend that she was a member of Al Qaeda and that she would "do something really big."
The threat was apparently meant as a joke, but American Airlines wasn't laughing.
The airline tweeted: "Sarah, we take these threats very seriously. Your IP address and details will be forwarded to security and the FBI."
I was particularly drawn to this story because of its similarities on things that happen around this community. The Internet offers the illusion of anonymity whilst simultaneously removing certain aspects of communication (e.g. subtleties in nuance and humor), so what could be intended as a joke could easily be misinterpreted as a serious statement. Alternatively, individuals who are embolded by the illusion of anonymity will believe that they are free from consequence, make legitimate threats, and then back-track in order to save themselves from consequences they thought they were invulnerable against. Whether it's admitting to hacks, threatening to DDoS, or outright saying that someone is going to slit my throat while I'm sleeping, it's sometimes difficult to tell what's sarcastic and what's humorous.
At the same time, how does one react to something like that? Is it better to err on the side of safety and assume that all statements are legitimate? Or is it better to write off any threats over the internet as empty attacks emboldened by some internet toughguy?
Which brings me to this case, and the current discussion question for the thread: did this girl deserve to be arrested for the tweet?
Last edited: