Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
I do agree with this just a little positive inconI've downloaded the map and seen enough to make a comment on it. I believe that there are too many little (and big) mistakes for it to be added to MCSG> For example, one of the glowstone lamps at spawn is missing. Also, you can see grass past chests where it is meant to be wool. Not gonna mention the spelling. Also, there are nowhere near enough buildings on the map, and the tier placement makes no sense, and has no reasonable pattern to it. There are hardly any custom trees, and too much of the map is covered in tall grass, making reasonable PvP impossible and laggy. The terraforming is terrible and not covered up or evend out to make the map reasonable.
As my teacher at school said, feedback should have a good point first, then a bad point, then a good point at the end.I've downloaded the map and seen enough to make a comment on it. I believe that there are too many little (and big) mistakes for it to be added to MCSG> For example, one of the glowstone lamps at spawn is missing. Also, you can see grass past chests where it is meant to be wool. Not gonna mention the spelling. Also, there are nowhere near enough buildings on the map, and the tier placement makes no sense, and has no reasonable pattern to it. There are hardly any custom trees, and too much of the map is covered in tall grass, making reasonable PvP impossible and laggy. The terraforming is terrible and not covered up or evend out to make the map reasonable.
Generally speaking, good points don't help. And how do I give a good point on something that is all-bad? What do I say? "Well done for spelling the name in one way in the title, and in another in the thread?"As my teacher at school said, feedback should have a good point first, then a bad point, then a good point at the end.