Points for Winning: Why this would make games better.

[CAmadeusA]

I know, so why did you include it in your little "list"

For the purpose of explanation.

Ye m8 lets fwken hav him.

Hahaaahahha

... English please?

Edit: Happy?

 

[FuSioN]

... English please?

Please don't double post. It's against the rules. Next time use the edit button.

 

[ShakeSchack]

I think it should double the points that the winner got from his kills so it encourages people to fight each other in the hope that when they win they get more points than before and this makes it a bit more fair because if a guy camps the whole game and then wins off of luck he shouldn't get that many points

 

[Ceroria]

Lol, only two donors commented... and saying "all you rich boys" was a little bit out of line... As for the actual suggestion, I wouldnt mind seeing a points prize for winning, but for the majority of the time, this is what the achievements system was supposed to achieve. You do good in a match, you get extra points! Kinda covers what your trying to suggest...

Also, what you may be confused about is the old kick message used to be was, "You were kicked for a player of a higher rank." I would know, I suggested it... That meant rank as in, permissions wise.

The ranking system goes
Player->Iron->Gold->Diamond->Friend->Vip->Mod->Sr Mod->Admin->Community Manager->ChadtheDJ->Developer

Currently it says so that a donor or staff member could join, as the kick message. They both meant the same thing.

Devs can kick Chad?! That doesn't seem very fair lol. But I guess the only way for that to even be possible is if there were 24 chads in 1 lobby. Imagine that...

 

[Qualia]

... English please?

Hahaha, I was speaking London street

 

[BlitzCometITU]

No, it will encourage camping, and no one likes a camper. And if this is added, only the winner should get it, it doesn't take skill, or strategy to get in 3rd, or 2nd even.

 

[MJM239]

You have to think about this logically here, guys...

Honestly, how many people do you seriously think would camp for 50 points? Honestly...

I mean, noobs already camp just to get to deathmatch. If this made a difference in terms of camping I'd be shocked.

 

[Otto]

Please don't double post. It's against the rules. Next time use the edit button.

He is a moderator, thats very rude.

 

[HalfSquirrel]

I didn't read the previous comments, but here is my 3 cents (yes 3!)
There is already a prize for getting first. I think you get 25-50 points for winning.
But I do agree a prize for getting in the places under that would be nice. 150 points is way too much though. If anything, I think:
1st place: 50 or less
2nd place: 30 or less
3rd place: 15 or less
150 points is enough to sponsor an enderpearl, and it's way more than you'll get for most kills. 50 is still quite a bit, but it's a good, even number and I think it's fine.

He is a moderator, thats very rude.

Moderators still have to obey the rules. It's not rude to tell a moderator he is doing something against the rules, that's about as rude as a staff member telling a normal player to stop breaking rules.

 

[FuSioN]

He is a moderator, thats very rude.

How's that rude. I say that to anyone who double posts. Like HalfSquirrel said, moderators still have to follow the rules.

 

[CAmadeusA]

He is a moderator, thats very rude.

Not really, im just lazy.

 

[X920MikeyB]

50 points for winning. No 2nd or 3rd, the hungergames can only have one victor