Deathmatch chest refill?

[Mlpoknzaba]

Not a fan. You know when a team ends up in dm? as they decided how they go about killing eachother, spectators are wasting their time watching.
Well adding this feature wouldn't help, it would actually make games even longer :S

How? Deathmatch lasts for 2 mins, I'm not suggesting you change the length of deathmatch.

Bad stuff.

Oh. Thanks

 

[TheMangoTiger]

I like the idea because if there are 2 looted up people and one person with rubbish stuff, then usually the 2 op people fight and leave the other one til after, BUT NOW they would have to have a 3 way fight or use more tactics etc to stop the rubbish person getting loads of good stuff

 

[HalfSquirrel]

I'm not completely against the idea, but I can't see how it would be useful. What if the chests had just done their normal refill? That leaves people to get over-decked during deathmatch, and it also makes it last longer when there are teams there so that they can get the refill. Deathmatch should not refill the chests in my opinion, especially since by the time deathmatch starts it's possible that there have already been 2 previous refills.

 

[VeeZa]

I'm not completely against the idea, but I can't see how it would be useful. What if the chests had just done their normal refill? That leaves people to get over-decked during deathmatch, and it also makes it last longer when there are teams there so that they can get the refill. Deathmatch should not refill the chests in my opinion, especially since by the time deathmatch starts it's possible that there have already been 2 previous refills.

^This.

 

[Rhino1928]

I like the idea of the refill. it would add a sort of reckless aspect tot the game.

 

[Sup3rT0nyRocks]

No, no, no, no, NO!
Someone lock this thread before it goes viral!

 

[VeeZa]

IMO it's unneeded. I wouldn't try to get anything anyway because I'd most likeley die because my back would be turned.

 

[Drybear1998]

IMO it's unneeded. I wouldn't try to get anything anyway because I'd most likeley die because my back would be turned.

That's kind of the point, it shouldn't be easy to get anything, but you would atleast have a chance

 

[VeeZa]

That's kind of the point, it shouldn't be easy to get anything, but you would atleast have a chance

True but most of the time you would end up dying!

 

[Sup3rT0nyRocks]

It's completely unneeded, please, this cannot be added.

 

[Mlpoknzaba]

I'm not completely against the idea, but I can't see how it would be useful. What if the chests had just done their normal refill? That leaves people to get over-decked during deathmatch, and it also makes it last longer when there are teams there so that they can get the refill. Deathmatch should not refill the chests in my opinion, especially since by the time deathmatch starts it's possible that there have already been 2 previous refills.

That's a good point.
Mabye the second refill could go and this would be the second refill instead?

No, no, no, no, NO!
Someone lock this thread before it goes viral!

Why not?

 

[Drybear1998]

That's a good point.
Mabye the second refill could go and this would be the second refill instead?

I think that would be perfect.