Tenebrous
Peacekeeper
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2014
- Messages
- 1,411
- Reaction score
- 1,622
What are you even talking about?this post is arrogant. /s
Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
What are you even talking about?this post is arrogant. /s
Mooclan mentioned that your style of writing is extremely arrogant (found it kinda ironic), so I just felt like replying to your comment with that.What are you even talking about?
You're trying to enter into a debate that is NOT about science that the other person NEEDS to use science in order to be "correct" or "accurate" or whatever you're looking for in a conclusive end.oh you were expecting detailed responses? bro i was giving brief summaries...
I was trying to imply that I'm too lazy to give a $#17 about arguing with you, but you always go and make it personal...
Haven't I explained sufficiently that you're looking at the wrong aspect of things?
You're trying to enter into a debate that is NOT about science that the other person NEEDS to use science in order to be "correct" or "accurate" or whatever you're looking for in a conclusive end.
Although the word "excuse" is often somewhat synonymous with "reason" and "explanation," in this case they have different meanings.
When it comes to religion, it's about faith. If you're going to fairly debate about miracles, spirituality, and the likes, then you need to have what's called an "open mind". As polite as it would be of me to say "fortunately for us, you do have an open mind", I simply can't say that without lying to myself - Seriously, dude, do you play football or any other contact sport? I get the impression that you might have had a few too many concussions.
oh whoa i'm actually getting a headache from reading through your post
that takes impressive amounts of absurdity.
yeah so do i, but we all know that science is incomplete and not advanced enough to definitively explain the creation of the universe, nor the existence of everything that is in the universe.
yeah..no..
trinity is wrong. LMAO.
almost everyone except the catholics know that..
i've met plenty of people who were catholic and totally awesome - heck, i've flirted with catholic girls. my best friend in grade 4-7 was catholic. the nicest butt i've ever seen belonged to a catholic girl. (too far?)
but that doesn't change the fact that the Pope is sometimes hypocritical, is definitely imperfect, and that certain catholic practices directly violate the Bible and it's contents.
please don't use trinity.
i'm going to veto/invalidate the entire above quote... without reading it. because seriously dude, you're trying waaaay too hard. and it's still irrelevant (not in an offensive way - it's just not applicable).
okay, so I went through about half the video, and then I glanced at what you said again..
"They use believers"
wtf?
getting someone who believes in God to pray =/= making a prayer that is:
from a perspective of belief (i feel like that's a grammatically incorrect way of describing it, but w/e)
for a purpose that does align with "God's Will" (a biblical concept)
that's just flawed logic, tene
my dearest tene....
we're not supposed to freakin' understand it.
-_-
???
even if we were to put a less extreme physical comparison on the scale, it still wouldn't line up:
Ant V.S. Human. Let's see who wins!
ant: follow pheromones or whatever and stab whatever moves
human: hmm let's flick this tiny ant before it gets into my coffee, and then i can continue the other 23 hours, 59 minutes, and 55 seconds of my day.
When dealing with the topic of whether or not a god exists, logic gets thrown out the window, because it simply isn't capable of handling that subject.
like, can you think of a new color?
probably not lmao
if you can, then i think we might have reached a new step in human evolution. LOL.
(oh, and by the way, i do personally partially believe in evolution, but not quite in the usual sense.)
it's a concept that attempts to come somewhat close to explaining how God "moves".
it's not supposed to be absolute or 100% accurate.
I was referring to the sources that you provided in our last debate, which I did prove to be false.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- does the word "fiction" ring a bell?
- public deception, influence, and distraction. "Bread and circuses"
- flat-out mistaken and incorrect, which does happen.
you'd have to go case-by-case
not ranting, reminding.
like I said a month ago: READ ABOUT IT BEFORE YOU COME TO ME. IT'S NOT MY JOB, YOU WERE THE ONE THAT STARTED THIS ENTIRE $#17SHOW, BRO.
┻━┻︵ \(°□°)/ ︵ ┻━┻
"Living Word":
Ever heard of "situational interpretations"?
Well, basically, you can come to one passage and read it and go "okay, so I learned ___ this lesson."
The next day, you can run into an annoying person/stressful situation, and then you can go back to that same passage, and re-read it, and go "okay, so now I learned another lesson from this passage."
Same passage, but it can be interpreted differently.
The way that people read it changes based on what's happening in their lives - thus, "living word". It's something that happens throughout the entire Bible, whereas other advanced-level books have difficulty achieving that effect in more than a single paragraph.
It's one of the reasons that the Bible is so critically acclaimed and widely-studied.
And, of course, it goes deeper than that - remember, I'm barely 17 years old. I FALL ASLEEP in church every time. A well-read theologian could easily cover this topic better than I can.
hold up, why are you trying to imply that I've been the one personally arguing pro-Christianity for hundreds/thousands of years? it wasn't me bro, go blame the other people.
thanks for the high expectations, but I never planned on taking this too seriously. You were the one that sought out a debate - like I said at the beginning of this post, I was originally here just to do some casual/light writing.
dude just stop trying to pick fights with me, it's annoying af. i don't know what you're trying to do. your writing style is also exceptionally arrogant, which is somewhat acceptable on a non-personal topic, but on a subject like religion, it would get you locked up in some countries.
this was not how i planned on spending half an hour of my 3-day weekend..
bless yo' soul for some comedic relief.
Oh hahaMooclan mentioned that your style of writing is extremely arrogant (found it kinda ironic), so I just felt like replying to your comment with that.
mine is too, btw, i just filter myself very heavily.Mooclan mentioned that your style of writing is extremely arrogant (found it kinda ironic), so I just felt like replying to your comment with that.
once i get into writing, that's another story. i don't stop till i find a place where i'm comfortable breaking it off. my issue lies with being challenged into actually making a post in the first place, since any forumer from 2013/2014 knows that i don't typically back down from challenges.Why do you keep responding and then complaining about the effort it takes for you to write out your posts?
I don't even see what you're trying to achieve; are you trying to defend religion or impose it onto others? Either way it's a pointless effort; irreligious people aren't going to suddenly start believing in some deity. It's not going to 'click' and make sense because there's nothing to make sense of.
lol what a memerthis post is arrogant. /s
mm i always did despise my grade 4 teachercritical thinking.
there's an OT, too...What? What are you talking about? What is God's Will? If he already has a "will" then what's the purpose in praying? There are no restrictions on prayer in the NT that say that it must be the "will of god".
that was my way of saying that you're asking for the impossible. you're literally asking me to define what IS defined (in a slightly different sense of the word) as "indefinable".Just saying that he is "so beyond us" is NOT a definition.
oh, but can we disprove the square circle?"THE SQUARE CIRCLE IS SO GREAT AND BEYOND US THAT IT DEFIES LOGIC AND THEREFORE CAN EXIST!!!11"
didn't i just agree with that?You are literally illogical. You are positing a being that is beyond logic and therefore is illogical.
refer to "indefinable"Once again, if you can't define what you're trying to argue for it's simply incoherent and thus meaningless.
except we can trace a bunch of these people back through the events of historyUnfortunately for you, most of the gospels / old testament would fall in the category of myth. Not going to go into the details but they share 100% of the characteristics you would expect from a mythical story.
isn't that what i just said?Isn't that the most subjective thing ever?
fun prediction facts:It's obvious that your interpretations cannot making meaningful predictions about the world and are thus practically useless.
/r/iamverysmartfun prediction facts:
i was able to predict the exact number of days before a couple broke up. (9 days)
i was able to predict that i'd sleep with a girl (no, not sexually) - who, when, and where.
i was able to predict 6 completely different girls that would develop crushes on me in the past 14 months, most of them at least a month ahead. i'm currently in the process of the 7th and 8th, and so far it's looking like i'm going to be right again - this time, my predictions were 6 and 4 months ago
coincidence.
#f***boy
LOL
i am also very cocky.
but with a voice as sexy as mine it's sort of ok
i found a turkish fanpage for me on Facebook
TURKISH.
FANPAGE.
ON FACEBOOK.
so, to make this post somewhat relevant:
"god" "debate"
:^) at the end of the day, we're all memers. #ultimatereligionLOL
I literally just deleted the response I was writing because that post was too amazing.
praise the meme gods:^) at the end of the day, we're all memers. #ultimatereligion
the mcgamer awards also say i'm good at pvp so lets not jump to conclusions:^) at the end of the day, we're all memers. #ultimatereligion