GET RID OF UNPOPULAR MAPS!

[RvngeOG]

Please get rid of the maps that nobody votes for anymore, because it annoys a lot of people when we join a lobby with no 'good' maps.
Ofcourse, there will be that 1 guy who likes it but no point
I mean these kind of maps,

Like seriously does anyone here actually LIKE Survival Games 2?? Huge map, takes 5 hours, 99% tier 1's
Just as an example, there are many other maps like this
You guys have to realise that the community likes SMALL, OP, maps.
Like:
SG4
Alaskan Village
Valleyside University
Par 72
Zone 85
Survival Games Adrenaline
ETC
I don't know if I'm just unlucky or WHAT because I BARELY find those maps in lobbies, it takes me like 5-10 lobbies just to find one.

 

[TheMangoTiger]

lol ok so just because YOU like certain maps all the ones YOU don't like have to be removed? and yes, I know some people may agree with you but others, like myself won't. I enjoy more of the actual surviving in the "survival" games rather than the (basically) kit pvp. SG2 definitely needs a re-tier but should never be removed, origins is amazing and so is fortune island, and mockingjay and bayside i don't personally play very often but are both well built and liked by many.


edit: also in my opinion valleyside, alaskan village and overplayed, sg adrenaline is not very well built(although i like the tiering) and sg4 and zone85 are boring. I usually leave if these maps are chosen but just because i personally don't like them as much as others doesn't mean i want them removed.....

 

[RvngeOG]

lol ok so just because YOU like certain maps all the ones YOU don't like have to be removed? and yes, I know some people may agree with you but others, like myself won't. I enjoy more of the actual surviving in the "survival" games rather than the (basically) kit pvp. SG2 definitely needs a re-tier but should never be removed, origins is amazing and so is fortune island, and mockingjay and bayside i don't personally play very often but are both well built and liked by many.

There are many maps that people simply do NOT vote for anymore, I'm saying remove those. No point in having them if it's never going to be played anyways. And sometimes when that map wins because of a "chance"' when 1 person votes for it, half the game leaves.

 

[RvngeOG]

lol ok so just because YOU like certain maps all the ones YOU don't like have to be removed? and yes, I know some people may agree with you but others, like myself won't. I enjoy more of the actual surviving in the "survival" games rather than the (basically) kit pvp. SG2 definitely needs a re-tier but should never be removed, origins is amazing and so is fortune island, and mockingjay and bayside i don't personally play very often but are both well built and liked by many.


edit: also in my opinion valleyside, alaskan village and overplayed, sg adrenaline is not very well built(although i like the tiering) and sg4 and zone85 are boring. I usually leave if these maps are chosen but just because i personally don't like them as much as others doesn't mean i want them removed.....

By your logic every map I mentioned is overplayed.
If we get those maps together in which the community loves, there won't be lobbies where there's only ONE map that has 100% of 90% of the vote.
There will be a difference, for example, every map will have a chance of being played, since people will actually be interested

 

[TheMangoTiger]

By your logic every map I mentioned is overplayed.
If we get those maps together in which the community loves, there won't be lobbies where there's only ONE map that has 100% of 90% of the vote.
There will be a difference, for example, every map will have a chance of being played, since people will actually be interested

"By your logic every map I mentioned is overplayed" when did i say this?
And i get what you're saying, but i disagree. Just because a map isn't liked but the MAJORITY of the community (origins, sg3, forune island and the other underplayed maps), doesn't mean some people don't enjoy it. Also that's the whole point of the voting and raffle system.

 

[RvngeOG]

"By your logic every map I mentioned is overplayed" when did i say this?
And i get what you're saying, but i disagree. Just because a map isn't liked but the MAJORITY of the community (origins, sg3, forune island and the other underplayed maps), doesn't mean some people don't enjoy it. Also that's the whole point of the voting and raffle system.

Well it's annoying when half the game leaves when a underplayed map gets chosen because of the voting system
The benefit of getting rid of this will be more variety of maps being voted for, and more chances for maps to be played in each lobby

 

[Tahsin]

As Mango said, just because the map isn't as popular as others, doesn't mean that people do not like the maps.

Personally, I actually enjoy greatly some of the unplayed maps whenever I get a chance to play them.

 

[Stralcsar]

bad tiering isn't a valid reason for a map to be removed. it's a reason to fix the tiering

 

[Dave]

first of all this is "survival"games its ment to be hard to find chests and second fun fact SG2 is not as big as people think it is the same size as Breeze island and a lot of other maps its just the buildings and the fact there so much in it that makes it feel big.

 

[T0M]

SG 2 Was my favourite map til mcgamer killed the teiring Hence destroyed all the old school routes. If you're an old school player You love these maps

 

[RvngeOG]

SG2 was just an example guys. There is SG3, Tresoracse Heights 2 (idk how to spell it), Ragnarok, Sg1, ETC

Nobody likes maps with bad tiering and no OP routes.

 

[itstomy]

I don't have a problem with any of the maps, I just play and find chests