-
Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
why mcsg SUCKS REALLY BAD
- Thread starter RasclartsRELOADED
- Start date
- Status
Stealthy
District 13
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2014
- Messages
- 2,319
- Reaction score
- 3,286
I_love_desk
Peacekeeper
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2013
- Messages
- 631
- Reaction score
- 1,153
I don't think you understand...
I have left, RasclartsRELOADED has pretty much left (moved to better servers), most of the clan community has left, and the only people left on EU are turks. Case in point: The fact that the server used to attract 6000 concurrent players, and now scrapes 2000 on a good day.
Mauro
Peacekeeper
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 592
- Reaction score
- 1,079
Naar
Survivor
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2015
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 41
From what I've seen your English level is 3 on scale from 0 to 10, I'm 100% sure you don't even know what we wrote.
VidFrom2012
Spectator
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2015
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 10
MCSG might aswel sell their servers to Turkey, the only non Turkish people are on forums rn.
ImTheNarwhal
District 13
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2012
- Messages
- 4,730
- Reaction score
- 1,544
Unfortunately, this thread has once again become out of control. I did specifically say to not start an argument and it has. Before I lock this, let me tell you it's not sweeping it under the rug. There were a lot of legitimate posts on here but when there is just constant arguing on the thread it has to be locked. Sorry that it has to be locked but I will send this thread to some sr mods for the next staff meeting.
TL
TL
Divining
Platinum
- Joined
- May 6, 2015
- Messages
- 934
- Reaction score
- 527
EDIT: Just realized this thread was locked. I mentioned earlier I'd be leaving my opinions & replies before it was locked, so it's only fair I still leave my opinions and reply even though it's locked. So for those wondering, before accusing me of blindly locking this thread, I am not the one who locked it.
Note, all the following replies and points reflect my personal opinion, not of MCGamer.
Open the spoiler below to read all my replies to the 17 reasons listed in the original post of this thread.
Note, all the following replies and points reflect my personal opinion, not of MCGamer.
Open the spoiler below to read all my replies to the 17 reasons listed in the original post of this thread.
1. If you feel a staff member has been hired incorrectly, go ahead and report 'em and it'll be handled accordingly. If a staff member acts differently when speaking to a Sr. Mod than a normal player in a negative manner, feel free to get evidence and report it accordingly.
2. In terms of anti cheat, yes, that's true, XAC more than likely won't ban you for that unfortunately. The anti cheat does need reworks
3. As for this one, that's completely untrue, if someone records / a staff member records you, you're basically done for in terms of playing on MCGamer.
4. Once again, fair point, and true in some cases. I've been personally spectating some of the top players trying to look for anything sketchy going on since the release of SoloSG? Has it worked? Nope, unfortunately :/
5. If you feel the staff team is blocking your enjoyment of clans, please direct any and all concerns to Nick, he's the head of clan staff.
6. 100% true. Unfortunately, Neph and Vanessa both failed, unfortunately none of us (even most us moderator's) don't have a reason as that's confidential admin information. I feel the same way as you do about this.
7. This is once again, true.
8. No comment on this since I have no clue what his ban was about.
9. I actually personally prefer 12 player Solo games, they go by far quicker, which I love. This one is all personal preference, not something that's a decisions' been made on.
10. I see no point for it to be bannable either, I agree with you on this.
11. Please forward any and all map concerns to AlpakaWhacker, he's the team lead for maps, etc.
12. Fair point, although no comment on this topic.
13. Sr. Moderator's are not difficult to contact, if you need one, try talking to a Moderator to get one of them online at a reasonable time, for example 4PM there are lots of them online, however if you need to contact one at 1AM, it's rare to get one since a lot of our Sr. Moderator's aren't on at that time. Administrator's, on the other hand, are difficult to contact and I fully understand that. Sometimes it takes 3-4 days for me to even get in contact with an Administrator, and I'm a Moderator, so I can only imagine how difficult it is for non-staff to contact them. There's not much I can about that than say I'm sorry. Hopefully Chad finds a way to fix this soon, since he's the only person above Administrator's.
14. I don't think it's the fact we didn't know what it was, I think it was more than less a lot of Mod's didn't know how to even think of identifying one.
15. 100% true, this needs to be looked into soon, although the developer's are only in control of Chad, and he normally doesn't snoop around these threads unfortunately.
16. Even if it's anywhere close to looking like hacks, but the Moderator has concerns of it being insufficient, there's a long discussion about it our moderator group. There have been discussions about some videos for 30-40 minutes. If they're blatantly insufficient, then said Moderator will turn it down immediately.
17. I was, for one, a Moderator who does this. As of recently, I've decided to change my attitude and actually give fair and non-bias replies to threads like this, which in this thread, that's exactly what I did. If you have real criticism, then it's even better to just relay it directly to a Sr. Mod via forum DM to avoid issues like this.
2. In terms of anti cheat, yes, that's true, XAC more than likely won't ban you for that unfortunately. The anti cheat does need reworks
3. As for this one, that's completely untrue, if someone records / a staff member records you, you're basically done for in terms of playing on MCGamer.
4. Once again, fair point, and true in some cases. I've been personally spectating some of the top players trying to look for anything sketchy going on since the release of SoloSG? Has it worked? Nope, unfortunately :/
5. If you feel the staff team is blocking your enjoyment of clans, please direct any and all concerns to Nick, he's the head of clan staff.
6. 100% true. Unfortunately, Neph and Vanessa both failed, unfortunately none of us (even most us moderator's) don't have a reason as that's confidential admin information. I feel the same way as you do about this.
7. This is once again, true.
8. No comment on this since I have no clue what his ban was about.
9. I actually personally prefer 12 player Solo games, they go by far quicker, which I love. This one is all personal preference, not something that's a decisions' been made on.
10. I see no point for it to be bannable either, I agree with you on this.
11. Please forward any and all map concerns to AlpakaWhacker, he's the team lead for maps, etc.
12. Fair point, although no comment on this topic.
13. Sr. Moderator's are not difficult to contact, if you need one, try talking to a Moderator to get one of them online at a reasonable time, for example 4PM there are lots of them online, however if you need to contact one at 1AM, it's rare to get one since a lot of our Sr. Moderator's aren't on at that time. Administrator's, on the other hand, are difficult to contact and I fully understand that. Sometimes it takes 3-4 days for me to even get in contact with an Administrator, and I'm a Moderator, so I can only imagine how difficult it is for non-staff to contact them. There's not much I can about that than say I'm sorry. Hopefully Chad finds a way to fix this soon, since he's the only person above Administrator's.
14. I don't think it's the fact we didn't know what it was, I think it was more than less a lot of Mod's didn't know how to even think of identifying one.
15. 100% true, this needs to be looked into soon, although the developer's are only in control of Chad, and he normally doesn't snoop around these threads unfortunately.
16. Even if it's anywhere close to looking like hacks, but the Moderator has concerns of it being insufficient, there's a long discussion about it our moderator group. There have been discussions about some videos for 30-40 minutes. If they're blatantly insufficient, then said Moderator will turn it down immediately.
17. I was, for one, a Moderator who does this. As of recently, I've decided to change my attitude and actually give fair and non-bias replies to threads like this, which in this thread, that's exactly what I did. If you have real criticism, then it's even better to just relay it directly to a Sr. Mod via forum DM to avoid issues like this.
- Status
