Anticheat

[Poncho]

I agree this anti cheat is not good. I feel as the mods just got lazy so they have this program doing everything for them.

 

[BlueCaptain]

If you really want to clean mcsg, install badlion's auto clicker detector. Im pretty sure there are more auto clickers than hackers on mcsg.

 

[Multi]

If you really want to clean mcsg, install badlion's auto clicker detector. Im pretty sure there are more auto clickers than hackers on mcsg.

It detects 18 cps ;-;

 

[Intensagod]

I just Hope I get unbanned

 

[Braden]

The anticheat is not 100% accurate as everyone here knows. Users getting falsely banned for the anticheat is inevitable, but you need to consider something rather important when thinking about the anticheat's faults. Would you rather have 95 hackers banned and 5 non-hackers banned per 100 or rather not have it at all?

The anticheat will always have room for improvement, but it is accurate enough to do what we need it to do with a rather impressive success rate. I believe it took the devs upwards of 10 minutes to trigger it and they knew exactly what they need to do to set it off. Yes, we do have members getting wrongfully banned from it, but they are obviously doing more than "killing someone" or "jumping off of a building" to trigger it.

There also is no proof of you using the hacks because the anticheat does not record users that are hacking, it only bans them. Getting banned by the anticheat is almost impossible to successfully dispute, however, I'd love to see what can be done about it. I'll add it to my document and see if anything can be brought up at our next staff meeting.

 

[Multi]

The anticheat is not 100% accurate as everyone here knows. Users getting falsely banned for the anticheat is inevitable, but you need to consider something rather important when thinking about the anticheat's faults. Would you rather have 95 hackers banned and 5 non-hackers banned per 100 or rather not have it at all?

The anticheat will always have room for improvement, but it is accurate enough to do what we need it to do with a rather impressive success rate. I believe it took the devs upwards of 10 minutes to trigger it and they knew exactly what they need to do to set it off. Yes, we do have members getting wrongfully banned from it, but they are obviously doing more than "killing someone" or "jumping off of a building" to trigger it.

There also is no proof of you using the hacks because the anticheat does not record users that are hacking, it only bans them. Getting banned by the anticheat is almost impossible to successfully dispute, however, I'd love to see what can be done about it. I'll add it to my document and see if anything can be brought up at our next staff meeting.

just remove the no-cheat.

 

[Evermore]

Would you rather have 95 hackers banned and 5 non-hackers banned per 100 or rather not have it at all?

I'd rather not have innocent people convicted under any circumstances...

 

[Braden]

I'd rather not have innocent people convicted under any circumstances...

Under ideal circumstances, that would be the case. I can relate to you because I don't like seeing innocent players being banned, which is why I want to try to bring some way to dispute the wrongful anticheat bans. Personally, I'd rather see less hackers as it makes the game more enjoyable to the majority of the community, where the wrongful bans only affect a slim portion of the community. It can be improved, which we both can agree on, but removing the anticheat as a whole is rather unlikely.

 

[Doubted]

Under ideal circumstances, that would be the case. I can relate to you because I don't like seeing innocent players being banned, which is why I want to try to bring some way to dispute the wrongful anticheat bans. Personally, I'd rather see less hackers as it makes the game more enjoyable to the majority of the community, where the wrongful bans only affect a slim portion of the community. It can be improved, which we both can agree on, but removing the anticheat as a whole is rather unlikely.

I agree this anti cheat is not good. I feel as the mods just got lazy so they have this program doing everything for them.

I agree with Poncho, mods are hella lazy nowadays

 

[Evermore]

Personally, I'd rather see less hackers as it makes the game more enjoyable to the majority of the community, where the wrongful bans only affect a slim portion of the community.

I honestly can't wrap my head around this rationale.

Say a crime was committed by 3 people, and there are 5 suspects; you would be okay with punishing all of them, even though they are innocent?

 

[DarkraiM8]

If it's No hack No ban why am I banned? I even made a video before I got banned of proof I don't hack.(Wich can be found here

)

It says your on Vanilla Minecraft, but you have optifne loaded. I don't get it

 

[Res]

thanks for making this thread josh, the xime anti cheat that mods call ''flawless'' and ''perfect'' is banning players that are legit and are known for their skill, I almost got perma-banned one day after taking out a 3 team but I had a bunch of friends on the staff team so I was unbanned from the server. It's super annoying and the staff acts like it's perfectly normal but it's ruining players' chances of becoming known on the network because they are being banned by bs.