• Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.

US Clan Leaderboards

Status
Not open for further replies.

NativeTalent

District 13
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
1,696
Reaction score
2,090
The old system was better in my opinion. It gave real meaning to being number one on leaderboards. So if this thing ever goes back to the old system, someone tag me and I'll be putting my clan in here.
 

Jawsh

Diamond
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
1,004
The old system was better in my opinion. It gave real meaning to being number one on leaderboards. So if this thing ever goes back to the old system, someone tag me and I'll be putting my clan in here.
The only reason that there is no meaning to being number one on leaderboards right now is because there are like 3 active clans on the leaderboards. In the old system, clans like Synergy, Tigers, Dexterity, and Invincible were all top 5 because they just wouldn't disband. It should be fair to put clans like that at such a high rank when they had more losses than wins. This new system highlights winning. The old system highlighted not disbanding.

Edit: Just give the ELO system a try. When the good clans actually start joining, the new system will lok better. We just need them to join. Soul Maxypie Jccandfriends JustAHotDog HarborSeal myruhh7 Spellyy NativeTalent
 

NativeTalent

District 13
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
1,696
Reaction score
2,090
The only reason that there is no meaning to being number one on leaderboards right now is because there are like 3 active clans on the leaderboards. In the old system, clans like Synergy, Tigers, Dexterity, and Invincible were all top 5 because they just wouldn't disband. It should be fair to put clans like that at such a high rank when they had more losses than wins. This new system highlights winning. The old system highlighted not disbanding.

Edit: Just give the ELO system a try. When the good clans actually start joining, the new system will lok better. We just need them to join. Soul Maxypie Jccandfriends JustAHotDog HarborSeal myruhh7 Spellyy NativeTalent
Not necessarily. They were top 5 AFTER the clans disbanded. While the clans were around they would drop due to the other clans winning. And if those clans can stay around longer than the better clans than maybe they do deserve to be there until another clan can rise up and beat those clans.
 

Jawsh

Diamond
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
1,004
Not necessarily. They were top 5 AFTER the clans disbanded. While the clans were around they would drop due to the other clans winning. And if those clans can stay around longer than the better clans than maybe they do deserve to be there until another clan can rise up and beat those clans.
It won't be the same as before even if we go back to the old system. Clans won't have amazing climbs up the leaderboards like before. There are only about 10-15 active clans and I don't expect more to be created like before. When it had about 30-50 clans, it was fun to climb the leaderboards, but now there aren't as many clans anymore. Also, to answer your point, I don't believe it is right to have a clan be second out of around 25-30 clans only winning once or twice. I saw that before with some of the other clans. They would lose like 6-7 times and only win once, but they would still be higher up on the leaderboards then the clans that rarely lost. I don't see how a clan could be ranked top 5 when they had more losses than wins. I just don't see how that is a productive leaderboards.
 

SertifiedBlocks

District 13
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Messages
2,354
Reaction score
1,321
The only reason that there is no meaning to being number one on leaderboards right now is because there are like 3 active clans on the leaderboards. In the old system, clans like Synergy, Tigers, Dexterity, and Invincible were all top 5 because they just wouldn't disband. It should be fair to put clans like that at such a high rank when they had more losses than wins. This new system highlights winning. The old system highlighted not disbanding.

Edit: Just give the ELO system a try. When the good clans actually start joining, the new system will lok better. We just need them to join. Soul Maxypie Jccandfriends JustAHotDog HarborSeal myruhh7 Spellyy NativeTalent
At least clans had to stick around to get a high rank. Now they join and they are number 4. This system blows, just like 1.8.
My clan (PotentReborn) has reached #2 on this leaderboard. Correct?
 

Jawsh

Diamond
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Messages
1,276
Reaction score
1,004
At least clans had to stick around to get a high rank. Now they join and they are number 4. This system blows, just like 1.8.
That is because of the lack of clans. Now there are less than 10 clans on the leaderboards. Before there was always over 30.
 

ImThatGuy007

Diamond
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
518
Reaction score
149
That is because of the lack of clans. Now there are less than 10 clans on the leaderboards. Before there was always over 30.
I think more clans will start applying if they actually change it, because it's going to be more fun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
242,192
Messages
2,449,550
Members
523,970
Latest member
Atasci