• Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.

US Clan Leaderboards

Status
Not open for further replies.

oshisomethingmeh

Experienced
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
471
Reaction score
227
Say everyone starts at 1600 rating. Team 1 (1600) vs team 2 (1600)

Team 1 gains 20 rating for winning
Team 2 loses 20 rating for losing.

Team 1 (1620) vs team 3 (1600)

Team 1 gains 18 rating for winning,

Team 2 loses 18 rating for losing

A few matches later..

Team 1 (1720) vs team 2 (1580)

Team 1 gains 8 rating for winning

Team 2 loses 8 rating for losing.

Team 1 (1728) vs team 3 (1582)

Team 3 gains 42 rating for winning.
Team 1 loses 42 rating for losing.


The farther the gap between the teams' rating is the more rating you'll win / lose. You would calculate exactly how much each team loses by a rating calculator. (Look up "elo calculator")

Pretty much like the old roxbot rating, league, or Badlion's elo system rn.
that'd be a great idea so that just because a good clan is new doesn't mean they need to win 27 battles to hit number 1
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2014
Messages
290
Reaction score
574
that'd be a great idea so that just because a good clan is new doesn't mean they need to win 27 battles to hit number 1
It would also mean low ranked teams could spam challenge higher ranked teams until they eventually lost. If they're only gaining 8 points per victory and losing 42 per loss, they would have to win A LOT to even break even. Eventually they're going to run into bad luck and lose a battle, and they'll lose way too many points when they do.

That being said, we are considering new ways of structuring the leaderboards.
 

oshisomethingmeh

Experienced
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
471
Reaction score
227
It would also mean low ranked teams could spam challenge higher ranked teams until they eventually lost. If they're only gaining 8 points per victory and losing 42 per loss, they would have to win A LOT to even break even. Eventually they're going to run into bad luck and lose a battle, and they'll lose way too many points when they do.

That being said, we are considering new ways of structuring the leaderboards.
Ty that makes sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
242,192
Messages
2,449,550
Members
523,971
Latest member
Atasci