Shanrrbananrr's Video

[Braden]

Something I have noticed over the time I have been a staff member, is that the people I have never seen in the Report Abuse section are the people that complain about the staff. That really grinds my gears.

 

[ChibiGoose]

Something I have noticed over the time I have been a staff member, is that the people I have never seen in the Report Abuse section are the people that complain about the staff. That really grinds my gears.

Yeah well im helping out now, im reporting tons of members by linking videos from my ban hackers channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSJypFeBukCtzz5uNcZf_8Q/feed

 

[Braden]

Yeah well im helping out now, im reporting tons of members by linking videos from my ban hackers channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSJypFeBukCtzz5uNcZf_8Q/feed

TheBanHammer

 

[ChibiGoose]

TheBanHammer

you jelly?

 

[Braden]

you jelly?

Its a very clever name. I love it.

 

[Sidopey]

Yeah just take part of what I said to make me look bad >_>

Dude he was just joking.

 

[NickSharpx ☆]

I think that moderators should even ban in-game, even without recording, because, in my opinion, moderators are people with experience that can recognize hackers really easily, so they should have the rights to do it. If they're dubious, I think they should record and ask for help to higher staff members. No matter if they appeal and there's no proof, there is still the testimonial of what the moderator (a person with experience, remind) has seen, so if he has recognized the player abusing, then it's alright. But that's my opinion, I'd like to see if people think the same as me or in different ways, so don't hesitate to quote this and reply me

 

[blotz_g2]

I think that moderators should even ban in-game, even without recording, because, in my opinion, moderators are people with experience that can recognize hackers really easily, so they should have the rights to do it. If they're dubious, I think they should record and ask for help to higher staff members. No matter if they appeal and there's no proof, there is still the testimonial of what the moderator (a person with experience, remind) has seen, so if he has recognized the player abusing, then it's alright. But that's my opinion, I'd like to see if people think the same as me or in different ways, so don't hesitate to quote this and reply me

You do know if someone makes a mod mad, they can just ban them for "Hacking", with no proof, this wouldn't work, mods cant even ban people with evidence, a sr. mod has to ban them, mods can only kick

 

[NickSharpx ☆]

You do know if someone makes a mod mad, they can just ban them for "Hacking", with no proof, this wouldn't work, mods cant even ban people with evidence, a sr. mod has to ban them, mods can only kick

Hmm yeah but I actually don't think moderators would do it, or atleast most of them. They are all professional people, who can valutate abusers and should have all the rights to ban them.

 

[Diar]

You do know if someone makes a mod mad, they can just ban them for "Hacking", with no proof, this wouldn't work, mods cant even ban people with evidence, a sr. mod has to ban them, mods can only kick

Absolutely none of this post is true. At all.

Moderators have access to kick, mute and ban players, for any time at all up to permanently. Every single ban they make has to be supported by evidence.

 

[HarborSeal]

There's no reason to complain about the moderators, I've never seen such a large network that actually cares enough to catch all the hackers and rule breakers. The mods are fine.

 

[blotz_g2]

Absolutely none of this post is true. At all.

Moderators have access to kick, mute and ban players, for any time at all up to permanently. Every single ban they make has to be supported by evidence.

I said it had to have evidence, LOL