Instead of censoring the chat..

[Sir Royal]

If someone curses, it will say this.

^$%^ You!

But my idea, is that instead of just blocking the curse word, block the whole sentence altogether from even being sent. - Aswell as warning them briefly what they're doing wrong by sending them a automated messege and if it continues you will automatically be kicked.

So no one is offended by the sentence. Obviously everyone knows what they meant, so what's the point of censoring it when you can just block it from being sent altogether?

 

[FuSioN]

How did someone not already think of this? You my friend are a genious! +1

 

[Zeno]

Support.

 

[ShaunDepro]

Why aren't you president?

 

[Beardy]

Genius!

 

[cadbane4321]

All hail Sir Royal!

 

[Damoisawesome]

Swag/10

 

[Ultraviolence]

I LOVE YOU I'M GOING TO MAIL OPRAH TO MEET WITH YOU.

 

[BlueBeetleHD]

You should apply for owner but in all seriousness I like this idea.

 

[Vinyl]

Because that would increase the chances of people using ways to bypass the censors. That way we would see more of the actual swear words and less things being censored.

 

[endthebean]

This guy is my type of guy

 

[HalfSquirrel]

Because that would increase the chances of people using ways to bypass the censors. That way we would see more of the actual swear words and less things being censored.

It would change nothing from what we have now, where people are constantly bypassing the swear filter anyways.

I think there would be problems with it, but I see where you're coming from. For one, you would need to make it track how many times this person has sworn and whether they've been kicked or not before, because if they're just repetitively getting kicked swearing doesn't really need to be against the rules. Also, people could swear all they wanted. People just wouldn't see it.

Unless it was made so that it automatically punishes the person more severely if they've already been kicked by it in the past, then it would be useless in my opinion.