Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
I'm sorry socially for breaking your rules, but this is not real proof. He does not say he is Kranzo, and he only says "I got 2 sets of full iron". That doesn't mean he was playing. Furthermore, this is a voice recording, and voice changers could have been used. Like in MCSG, voice recordings should not be used because they can be faked.
I've told you this on multiple occasions. Kranzo has a distinctive voice, and it's obviously him. You're DQed, and that's how it is. There's no point in arguing with it and ruining your reputation. Just own up to it, and keep the reputation that you still have.
How could he have gotten 2 full sets of iron if he wasn't playing? o.0
Here is my point. In all honesty, this evidence could not stand for even an mcsg ban, if it was against the rules. The screenshots didn't prove he was playing, and a voice message can be faked. Furthermore, getting 2 full sets of iron could refer to something else, like an MCSG game. I know all this sounds stupid, but one can't prove he was referring to the Clan war. I'm posting so tech can reform his ideas, and actually take PROOF when DQing someone.
Who even are you, a trial pending cheerleader?
You know what he sounds like, so don't even go there. How is the evidence not Valid? The counter argument React gave was "anyone can change a Buddy's name". I took 3/4 of the screenshots, that we DQed them for, so don't even go there.
I am the oldest member in react.
I think you don't understand my point. I am trying to improve your methods of DQing a clan. You should DQ a clan when you actually have proof. Looking at the screenshots, they don't prove a single thing. They prove he changed his name to Nick, and he got owner. Does it prove he played? Nope. On to the voice message, sure, he sounds like that. But what he says doesn't prove he played, and what he says doesn't prove he played as well. I know dark pulled us out, but it was a legit clan war, and it was a legit 6-0. Thats why it is staying on our thread.Techaton said:
Why are you still lying? It's not going to change. Hopefully you learn something out of this instead of continuing with your raging argument.
Are you forgetting the fact that Dark's computer is broken? He joined the teamspeak later on iOS (His phone) to talk to Frog, Mikey, and Cucumber. The evidence is sufficient, it's his event, and it was not a legit battle. That's how it stands, and it will continue to stand that way.
The battle itself would count but under the rules of clan wars you guys are disqualified. This ain't CSI baby, stop saying the evidence is insufficient, this is a video game bud.
OK? Why did the Real Darklum3n connect to the TS during the Battle... Why was the fake Nick in the Clan Battle Room and not with the rest if the members who weren't playing. There is no way, anyone is going to believe this is all just a coincidence besides React.
