leMaCderp
Career
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 788
- Reaction score
- 309
My friend begged me to play a match on MCSG. I reluctantly agreed, connected into the server, and saw a moderator. I then remembered he would scold players, calling them "c**nts", blockglitch and abuse current glitches. That was before I left, I wasn't sure whether he had changed.
Moving on, I'm just wondering, should we have moderator applications? Should moderators pick the j. Moderators?
Pros : It gives information. Even if they are not looked at, you still get an idea of what they are like. In horrible timezones where moderators rarely assist you, it could help moderators decide on the new batch of moderators. Those who report hackers or glitchers also give an idea, whether they are biased, and such. People who write " I want to be known being mod" or " I want power" can be taken off the lists.
Cons : Players can be deceitful. Lying on an application is rather easy and takes under half an hour to do so. Actions speak more than words.
Some players may abuse their powers.
Also, having applications makes it a " Who wants to be a mod? " system. If one asks to be a moderator, they don't really have any reason to be one. Applications just tell them that frame of mind. Admins and moderators should hand-pick those who deserve it, not those who want it. Being a moderator is like a babysitter, moderating the MCSG community and making sure they do not break the rules.
Moderators shouldn't "join" to being a moderator, they should be "invited". Some players just want it for fame and power, and so that they can do anything they want if there are hackers. There many power-mad players who cannot fulfill the duties of a moderator. The rank should be earned, not applying to earn, by character, behaviour etc...
You would also get less " im from planet minecraft i want to test your commands " applications. It might also save the time of senior moderators and admins, having read so many worthless applications.
I suggest a strict limit, such as playtime, their activity on the forums and a vote monthly, where everyone gets to vote for a worthy moderator. Something like a "Moderator" spotlight. It could help decide the new moderators.
Also, moderators shouldn't be allowed to use Nodus, I found a channel of a moderator using FullBright... Etc. His argument? " To combat the hackers and let them have a taste of their own medicene. "
I am not saying that the system is retarded, I am just saying, MCSG should handpick moderators worthy of the rank, not power-hungry players who can't fulfill their duties.
Moving on, I'm just wondering, should we have moderator applications? Should moderators pick the j. Moderators?
Pros : It gives information. Even if they are not looked at, you still get an idea of what they are like. In horrible timezones where moderators rarely assist you, it could help moderators decide on the new batch of moderators. Those who report hackers or glitchers also give an idea, whether they are biased, and such. People who write " I want to be known being mod" or " I want power" can be taken off the lists.
Cons : Players can be deceitful. Lying on an application is rather easy and takes under half an hour to do so. Actions speak more than words.
Some players may abuse their powers.
Also, having applications makes it a " Who wants to be a mod? " system. If one asks to be a moderator, they don't really have any reason to be one. Applications just tell them that frame of mind. Admins and moderators should hand-pick those who deserve it, not those who want it. Being a moderator is like a babysitter, moderating the MCSG community and making sure they do not break the rules.
Moderators shouldn't "join" to being a moderator, they should be "invited". Some players just want it for fame and power, and so that they can do anything they want if there are hackers. There many power-mad players who cannot fulfill the duties of a moderator. The rank should be earned, not applying to earn, by character, behaviour etc...
You would also get less " im from planet minecraft i want to test your commands " applications. It might also save the time of senior moderators and admins, having read so many worthless applications.
I suggest a strict limit, such as playtime, their activity on the forums and a vote monthly, where everyone gets to vote for a worthy moderator. Something like a "Moderator" spotlight. It could help decide the new moderators.
Also, moderators shouldn't be allowed to use Nodus, I found a channel of a moderator using FullBright... Etc. His argument? " To combat the hackers and let them have a taste of their own medicene. "
I am not saying that the system is retarded, I am just saying, MCSG should handpick moderators worthy of the rank, not power-hungry players who can't fulfill their duties.