Balancing Donor Privileges

[Zoeticly]

i think its a great idea. i just recently got my iron donor and before i would only play in the 20-30 servers(even then i would get kicked a lot). before i had no chance whatsoever to get in the lower ones. and i think non donors deserve a chance to play in the lower servers too.

 

[Dentalrednasty]

I don't know how the situation on the US servers is, But in the EU Donors almost never take over games, most of the time its is not even 50-50,

 

[John123XD]

What if there all the servers were with 48 players? Wouldn't that make things a lot easier.

 

[Xxpsbounty567xX]

What if there all the servers were with 48 players? Wouldn't that make things a lot easier.

Yes but that would be expensive and some players don't like 48 player games.

 

[John123XD]

Yes but that would be expensive and some players don't like 48 player games.

I understand

 

[Levah]

I think there should be Side servers for Doners and Other servers for Non donors. Still have the normal servers where doners can play with non doners but if you have other servers dedicated to doners then the kick rate and rage rate will go down as i was about to start again there was 5 seconds remaing untill the game but then....I get kicked. Leave a like if you think this is a good idea

 

[HalfSquirrel]

I think there should be Side servers for Doners and Other servers for Non donors. Still have the normal servers where doners can play with non doners but if you have other servers dedicated to doners then the kick rate and rage rate will go down as i was about to start again there was 5 seconds remaing untill the game but then....I get kicked. Leave a like if you think this is a good idea

0 likes. This has been suggested countless times, will be suggested countless more and will never happen. That makes donating completely pointless. If you want you can donate yourself or join a server earlier.

 

[The_Arena_Master]

This thread is basically donors voting no, and regulars voting yes.

 

[HalfSquirrel]

This thread is basically donors voting no, and regulars voting yes.

Plenty of donors have voted yes.

 

[greenshirtman]

Plenty of donors have voted yes.

I like this idea, I didn't have donor for a while, and it is really annoying.

 

[Rhino1928]

What if Non-donors couldnt be kicked for 1 minute. Like not if they were 43s left and a non-donor joined, he would have no protection only 2m-1m would donors have protection. Because most donors (well in my opinion) as soon as they cant get access they will just move on to find a new server.

P.S. Srry if i didnt explain my idea clearly, it sounded great in my head. :/

 

[HalfSquirrel]

What if Non-donors couldnt be kicked for 1 minute. Like not if they were 43s left and a non-donor joined, he would have no protection only 2m-1m would donors have protection. Because most donors (well in my opinion) as soon as they cant get access they will just move on to find a new server.

P.S. Srry if i didnt explain my idea clearly, it sounded great in my head. :/

From what I understood of it, when members join a server they can't get kicked until 1 minute after they joined. That seems a bit unfair to donors, maybe 20-30 seconds if that's what you mean.