Alright, I guess I will have to get involved in this discussion after all. Most of everyone's points are correct, but need further annunciation. I'll take them post by post.
I've noticed a lot of mcsg staff has been retiring lately. My theory is that the rule 15 years and up for moderator applications is the problem.
Truth: A number of MCG staff have been retiring. People are always retiring and resigning over time, and we accept that.
False: The number of staff is declining overall. People are quitting faster than they're being hired- OMG! The Sink is Shipping!
What You Don't Realize: As the guy who has to send out staff email notifications to every staff member for every staff meeting, I can say that the staff number has always been growing.
Then why does it seem like a problem? Because the mods who are recognized and popular are retiring, but that doesn't mean other mods don't exist. In fact, our new mods will become the new recognized and popular mods with some added time, because that's just how communities work. So just because the mods we know and like may be leaving, doesn't mean there are no mods left at all.
We recently shut down moderator applications so that we could get a better handle on the mass of them that are coming in. We wouldn't do that if we were facing some sort of mod shortage.
And I don't see how the age limit is forcing current mods to retire. The post states that the problem is staff retirement, yet states that the age limit is the problem. What?
There are a large number of staff who are below the required age minimum. They were approved for age exceptions.
ThePikachuPro, Bstone36, CaptButterToast, and certainly more that don't immediately come to mind.
There are a number of other mods as well who were/are under our current age limit, but most of them were applied and accepted when the age limit was 14. Only a handful of the mods were passed via Age Exception, and that was usually while Chad was handling them. The current mod apps with the current age exceptions are still pending processing.
I know that, but i just think that putting an age exception in would decrease my chances.
I don't understand the logic of this statement. If an Age Exception would lower the likelihood of your moderator application being accepted, then why would we have the Age Exception process in the first place?
Age Exceptions exist to give players with exceptional skills and conditions (i.e. underage, but demonstrating considerable ability and maturity) an equal chance as the people who are applying normally. In fact, I would venture that having an Age Exception makes an applicant more likely to be accepted. The Age Exception Process includes a fairly vigorous vetting process that checks for a number of things beyond the reach of a normal moderator application. If someone passes the Age Exception Process, they've succeeded through a series of checks that are more intense than the Moderator Application Process; the two processes simply check different things to different levels of depth.