NotCanziano
Diamond
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
- Messages
- 930
- Reaction score
- 1,560
If any of you watch professional CS:GO, you will most likely be familiar with the veto process. The veto process allows teams to ban and pick the maps that are going to be played in a BO-X series. The veto process will normally go like this for a BO-3 series:
I believe that using this system will make the clan scene more competitive, as they will be forced to play/learn all of the maps that are in the map pool. This will determine what the best clan is over a variety of maps and clan wars will not be boring/repetitive as clans force each other to play the same maps over and over.
Thoughts? Good idea, bad idea?
Fnatic ban de_mirage.
EnVyUs ban de_cbble.
Fnatic ban de_overpass.
EnVyUs ban de_cache.
---
Fnatic pick de_inferno.
EnVyUs pick de_dust2.
---
de_train is the deciding map, if it ends 1-1 after the first two maps.
This veto system can be used for any BO-X series, it just depends on how many maps you have in the "competitive map pool".EnVyUs ban de_cbble.
Fnatic ban de_overpass.
EnVyUs ban de_cache.
---
Fnatic pick de_inferno.
EnVyUs pick de_dust2.
---
de_train is the deciding map, if it ends 1-1 after the first two maps.
I believe that using this system will make the clan scene more competitive, as they will be forced to play/learn all of the maps that are in the map pool. This will determine what the best clan is over a variety of maps and clan wars will not be boring/repetitive as clans force each other to play the same maps over and over.
Thoughts? Good idea, bad idea?