Trilexium
Peacekeeper
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,127
- Reaction score
- 981
Death- the inescapable and ultimate fate that every lifeform (except the few organisms deemed to be 'theoretically immortal') has been set on a path to since said lifeform's conception. We know what happens during life, but do we know what happens after life? What do we have to look forward to?
There are many viewpoints depending on which way you look at it. Religious views seem to be more prevalent than their logical, theoretical or scientific explanations, but [being a non-religious person] I doubt the credibility of religious ideas like heaven and reincarnation.
A personal theory of mine relates the so-called afterlife with the sensation and experience associated with dreaming. When we dream, we often perceive the visions, actions and events that take place in that dream to be real- pertinent to the realm of our reality (just some needed clarification for later on). What if the very life we supposedly live right now as you read this post or as I type it is just a dream[-like experience]? My theory is that right now, while we're not aware of it, we are living the afterlife of our previous selves (or 'lives'- yes, this is a paradox). An afterlife where the 'lives' as we call them are related on a global scale, allowing for us to establish reason for why things are. This theory questions and asks to redefine the meaning of life- what is life? Do we have proof anything in 'life' is 'real'? (there's a great Vsauce video on that- highly recommend watching it) So, basically, after this experience ends, another will begin, paradoxically, until the end of the universe when the energy required to coalesce into an experience is no more.
That's some deep stuff. I'm only 15, but this theory I have established greatly interests me.
There's also evidence I read somewhere (forgot where, but it was an incredibly interesting science forum post) that after we've been dead, natural neurological activity in the brain has been observed to continue despite not having any oxygen or nutrients to sustain it. Of course, the brain is flesh and that will eventually decay, so I'm not quite sure where that theory goes.
What are your thoughts on this state-of-mind critical question?
(this thread was started to bring about some quality, thought-provoking stuff that people have been saying is becoming less and less frequent on these forums- I agree, so have fun with this and thank me later)
There are many viewpoints depending on which way you look at it. Religious views seem to be more prevalent than their logical, theoretical or scientific explanations, but [being a non-religious person] I doubt the credibility of religious ideas like heaven and reincarnation.
A personal theory of mine relates the so-called afterlife with the sensation and experience associated with dreaming. When we dream, we often perceive the visions, actions and events that take place in that dream to be real- pertinent to the realm of our reality (just some needed clarification for later on). What if the very life we supposedly live right now as you read this post or as I type it is just a dream[-like experience]? My theory is that right now, while we're not aware of it, we are living the afterlife of our previous selves (or 'lives'- yes, this is a paradox). An afterlife where the 'lives' as we call them are related on a global scale, allowing for us to establish reason for why things are. This theory questions and asks to redefine the meaning of life- what is life? Do we have proof anything in 'life' is 'real'? (there's a great Vsauce video on that- highly recommend watching it) So, basically, after this experience ends, another will begin, paradoxically, until the end of the universe when the energy required to coalesce into an experience is no more.
That's some deep stuff. I'm only 15, but this theory I have established greatly interests me.
There's also evidence I read somewhere (forgot where, but it was an incredibly interesting science forum post) that after we've been dead, natural neurological activity in the brain has been observed to continue despite not having any oxygen or nutrients to sustain it. Of course, the brain is flesh and that will eventually decay, so I'm not quite sure where that theory goes.
What are your thoughts on this state-of-mind critical question?
(this thread was started to bring about some quality, thought-provoking stuff that people have been saying is becoming less and less frequent on these forums- I agree, so have fun with this and thank me later)