Our Minecraft servers are offline but we will keep this forum online for any community communication. Site permissions for posting could change at a later date but will remain online.
No. The government wouldn't lie to keep people calm about something that we have known about since 1976. Besides, blatantly lying to your own people doesn't work in the age of the internet. People can just do some research or pay attention to a country other than their own.Do you think the government might be lying about it only being transmitted through certain things, just to make sure everyone is calm?
Probably not, but it's good to be safe. There have been 34 instances of ebola outbreaks throughout history, starting in 1976. Many only affected a couple of people. Other instances affected no people, but rather, monkeys. Unfortunately, the current instance is by far the largest. There are currently about 2,000 people with the virus disease, (and roughly another 2,000 who have already died) in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea, as well as one isolated case in Dakar, Senegal and another singular case in Dallas, Texas. Of course, the virus disease takes 21 days to show symptoms after infection, so there could be more than we think. The disease has occurred in five separate strains throughout history, so it is possible that it could mutate, but that doesn't mean it will. The current strain has a 49% survival rate with our current medical and hygiene practices, (which is pretty good considering that this is happening in some of the poorest countries in the world, with help from other countries) so it is not killing everything in its path.
- Do you think it could turn into a world-wide plague?
No. Health officials and scientists have blatantly stated over and over that it is not airborne, but is contracted by body fluids and by skin contact. There is no room for opinion or conspiracy here. If the disease was airborne, a lot more people would have it. If it mutated to become airborne, it would probably have entirely different symptoms, less related to the bloodstream and destruction of internal organs.Do you think it is airborne? (Related to question 1)
The thing is that Ebola is just a tad more dangerous than swine fluI think this Ebola thing is just going to be another "swine flu" like last year. People are overreacting.